1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Monitoring Page-State Contract
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-15 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation pass completed on 2026-04-15.
- Route identifiers, page class paths, and operator action labels are included because the repository template and constitution require explicit scope, action-surface, and page-contract definitions for operator-facing changes.
- The spec intentionally introduces a bounded monitoring page-state taxonomy while rejecting a global shell refactor, a runtime state framework, and any forced flattening of Compare Matrix.