TenantAtlas/docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-009-provider-connections.md
Ahmed Darrazi 893af34bad
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 53s
docs: add tenantial enterprise UI audit foundation
2026-05-17 19:34:25 +02:00

49 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

# UI-009 Provider Connections
| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Route | `/admin/provider-connections` |
| Source | `ProviderConnectionResource` |
| Area / scope | Provider / integration / workspace |
| Archetype | Provider / Integration |
| Design depth | Strategic Surface |
| Repo truth | repo-verified |
| Screenshot | `../screenshots/desktop/ui-009-provider-connections.png` |
| Browser status | Reached through workspace route. |
## First Five Seconds
The surface is the main integration authority. It should make connection health, scope, credentials/consent state, and safe next action legible without exposing secrets or raw provider errors by default.
## Productization Review
- Decision-first: medium; table needs stronger next-action state.
- Evidence-first: provider health and verification can support decisions.
- Context: workspace-owned provider connection surface.
- Customer/auditor safety: internal/operator only.
- Diagnostics: raw provider details must stay hidden or support-gated.
## Information Inventory
Default content should include provider, connection type, target scope, health, permissions/consent, last verification, and next action. Diagnostic details should explain missing policy/scopes without raw secrets.
## Dangerous Actions
Credential rotation, disconnect/disable, reverify, and delete are high-impact. Target design must include authorization, confirmation, audit, and recovery guidance.
## Scores
| IA | Density | User Clarity | Sellability | Disclosure | Hierarchy | DS Fit | A11y | Responsive | Components | UX Writing | Perf |
| ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
## Top Issues
1. Needs stronger health/permission summary over raw integration detail.
2. Dangerous provider actions require target confirmation and audit treatment.
3. Provider-specific terminology should not leak into platform-core copy.
## Target Direction
P0 individual target mockup. This is a trust-critical setup and recovery surface.