ahmido
51ea80ca05
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 1m5s
Automatisch erstellt: Commit & Push aus Workspace (WIP) Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #298
48 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Enforce Creation-Time Finding Invariants
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-29
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] Repo-specific classes, routes, file paths, and validation commands appear only where they are required to keep the three active writer families and proof obligations unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for product and review stakeholders, with repo-grounded detail only where the bounded invariant target would otherwise stay ambiguous
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria stay outcome-oriented even though the package names concrete writer families and proof files needed to bound the slice
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No unbounded implementation plan leaks into the specification; repo-specific commands and paths stay limited to selection, dependency, and validation context
|
|
|
|
## Test Governance Review
|
|
|
|
- [x] Lane fit is explicit: the package uses `fast-feedback` and `confidence`, with the three writer suites as the primary proof and only bounded recurrence, consumer, and trigger-authorization regressions where FR-255-005, FR-255-006, FR-255-009, and FR-255-011 require them.
|
|
- [x] No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; adjacent proof remains inside existing feature suites only.
|
|
- [x] Suite-cost outcome stays bounded and reviewable: the package reuses existing writer, recurrence, consumer, and auth suites without adding a new default-heavy harness.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] Review outcome class: `acceptable-special-case`
|
|
- [x] Workflow outcome: `keep`
|
|
- [x] Review-note location is explicit: guardrail, lane-fit, and bounded-proof notes live in `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, and this checklist.
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Repo-surface names, validation commands, and current writer/test anchors are intentionally present because this prep package must distinguish the three active finding writers from already-completed adjacent cleanup specs.
|
|
- The spec remains behavior-first: write-time lifecycle readiness, recurrence identity, reopen truth, and unchanged RBAC/tenant isolation are the product outcomes; repo details only keep the package reviewable and bounded.
|
|
- No blocking open question remains for safe planning. |