## Summary - add the Spec 325 artifacts for screenshot-anchored strategic target images - update the UI/UX enterprise audit documents to capture strategic surfaces and grouped follow-up candidates - add supporting follow-up specs, target experience briefs, and target image assets for the audit workflow ## Testing - not run (documentation/spec artifact changes only) Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #385
47 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
47 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
# Spec 325 Strategic Target Image Implementation Candidates
|
|
|
|
Spec 325 creates target artifacts only. These candidates group later runtime implementation work proportionally so the project does not create one implementation spec per small page.
|
|
|
|
## Recommended Order
|
|
|
|
| Order | Candidate lane | Source target artifacts | Why this group is proportional |
|
|
| ---: | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| 1 | Customer Review Workspace productization | `../target-experience-briefs/customer-review-workspace.md`, `../target-images/target/customer-review-workspace-target.md` | Highest sellability and customer-safe review impact. |
|
|
| 2 | Governance Inbox decision experience | `../target-experience-briefs/governance-inbox.md`, `../target-images/target/governance-inbox-target.md` | Central operator human-in-the-loop workflow; can absorb decision register and exception detail patterns later. |
|
|
| 3 | Operations Hub productization | `../target-experience-briefs/operations-hub.md`, `../target-images/target/operations-hub-target.md` | Establishes execution truth and OperationRun outcome grammar before related alert/run detail work. |
|
|
| 4 | Evidence and review pack consumption productization | `../target-experience-briefs/audit-log.md`, `../target-experience-briefs/customer-review-workspace.md` | Provides customer-safe proof and audit/export language without overloading runtime pages with raw diagnostics. |
|
|
| 5 | Restore safety UX productization | `../target-experience-briefs/restore-safety-workflow.md`, `../target-images/target/restore-safety-workflow-target.md` | Highest destructive-action risk; needs seeded capability/browser fixture and strict audit/OperationRun tests. |
|
|
| 6 | Provider onboarding/readiness UX cleanup | `../target-experience-briefs/provider-readiness.md`, `../target-images/target/provider-readiness-target.md` | Trust-critical setup and recovery surface; can later extend to create/detail/onboarding wizard states. |
|
|
| 7 | Drift/Baseline decision experience | `../target-experience-briefs/baseline-compare-drift.md`, `../target-images/target/baseline-compare-drift-target.md` | Requires seeded baseline/compare data; target first defines assignment, evidence gaps, and decision hierarchy. |
|
|
| 8 | Workspace and Environment dashboard productization | `../target-experience-briefs/workspace-overview.md`, `../target-experience-briefs/environment-dashboard.md` | High first-read value; can be implemented after decision/action hierarchy is agreed. |
|
|
|
|
## Shared Pattern Dependencies
|
|
|
|
Spec 326 Tenantial Pattern Library & State System should be prepared before broad implementation if multiple lanes begin to repeat:
|
|
|
|
- status/trust badges
|
|
- evidence summary strips
|
|
- OperationRun outcome strips
|
|
- dangerous-action confirmation grammar
|
|
- customer-safe review cards
|
|
- detail drawer disclosure levels
|
|
- empty/loading/error state grammar
|
|
- workspace/environment context headers
|
|
|
|
Do not turn these into a runtime framework inside a single page implementation. Extract only after real repeated cases prove the need.
|
|
|
|
## Conceptual Elements Requiring Repo Verification
|
|
|
|
| Element | Why verification is required |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| Recommended next action copy | Must come from real policy/capability/operation state, not target-image prose. |
|
|
| Evidence completeness and freshness labels | Must map to existing evidence snapshots, review packs, reports, or explicit new spec scope. |
|
|
| Restore safety gate steps | Must map to actual restore dry-run, validation, confirmation, audit, and OperationRun behavior. |
|
|
| Provider permission readiness | Must map to provider connection state, required permissions, and safe diagnostic disclosure. |
|
|
| Drift impact summaries | Must map to assigned baseline, latest compare result, evidence gaps, and tenant/environment scope. |
|
|
| Customer-safe export/share actions | Must be authorized, audited, scoped, and redacted before becoming runtime UI. |
|
|
|
|
## Do Not Implement Yet
|
|
|
|
Do not implement every visual tile, label, drawer, or action shown in target PNGs as a literal UI requirement. Later specs must first confirm data availability, RBAC, workspace/environment entitlement, audit logging, OperationRun semantics, customer-safe disclosure, and dangerous-action confirmation behavior.
|