ahmido
8a889a863e
## Summary - add the Spec 323 Tenantial enterprise UI audit foundation package - add the UI/UX audit registry artifacts, templates, and supporting brand context placeholder - update Spec Kit prompts/templates plus PR fast-feedback guardrails for ongoing UI productization coverage ## Scope - docs-first audit foundation only - no runtime Laravel, Filament, Livewire, route, auth, or database behavior changes intended ## Validation - [x] `git diff --check` - [ ] application test suite run ## Notes - primary spec: `specs/323-tenantial-enterprise-ui-audit-foundation/` - this branch also updates `.gitea/pull_request_template.md`, `.gitea/workflows/test-pr-fast-feedback.yml`, and `scripts/check-ui-productization-coverage` to make the coverage gate durable for future UI work Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #383
49 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# UI-003 Operations
|
|
|
|
| Field | Value |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| Route | `/admin/workspaces/{workspace}/operations` |
|
|
| Source | `Operations`, `OperationRunLinks` |
|
|
| Area / scope | Monitoring / workspace |
|
|
| Archetype | Operations / Monitoring |
|
|
| Design depth | Strategic Surface |
|
|
| Repo truth | repo-verified |
|
|
| Screenshot | `../screenshots/desktop/ui-003-operations.png` |
|
|
| Browser status | Reached through local workspace route. |
|
|
|
|
## First Five Seconds
|
|
|
|
The page reads as an operations monitor. It communicates execution truth, but it still needs a sharper split between active work, terminal follow-up, and diagnostic history.
|
|
|
|
## Productization Review
|
|
|
|
- Decision-first: medium; monitoring tends to be chronological.
|
|
- Evidence-first: OperationRun records are the source.
|
|
- Context: workspace route is explicit.
|
|
- Customer/auditor safety: not customer-facing by default.
|
|
- Diagnostics: appropriate as the primary mode here, but should not imply governance health.
|
|
|
|
## Information Inventory
|
|
|
|
The page exposes run state, status, recent work, and likely links to run detail. Execution outcome is visible; governance result and artifact truth remain separate surfaces.
|
|
|
|
## Dangerous Actions
|
|
|
|
Potential actions include retry, cancel, investigate, or open related artifacts. Target design should keep terminal actions confirmation-gated and secondary to run inspection.
|
|
|
|
## Scores
|
|
|
|
| IA | Density | User Clarity | Sellability | Disclosure | Hierarchy | DS Fit | A11y | Responsive | Components | UX Writing | Perf |
|
|
| ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
|
|
| 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
## Top Issues
|
|
|
|
1. Execution truth must stay visually separate from product health.
|
|
2. Detail drilldowns need consistent evidence/result links.
|
|
3. Responsive/table behavior was not captured.
|
|
|
|
## Target Direction
|
|
|
|
P1 strategic target. Use one monitoring pattern for active, failed, partial, and completed runs, with evidence/result links delegated to shared OperationRun UX contracts.
|