TenantAtlas/specs/296-full-suite-green-signal-restoration/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Full Suite Green Signal Restoration

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation
Created: 2026-05-11
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• No application implementation was performed during preparation.
• Focused on maintainer/operator value: restore or explicitly control the full-suite CI signal.
• Written for maintainers and reviewers who must execute a stabilization loop.
• All mandatory Spec Kit sections are completed or explicitly marked N/A.

Requirement Completeness

• No unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
• Success criteria are measurable.
• Success criteria are repo-aware only where validation commands require it.
• All acceptance scenarios are defined.
• Edge cases are identified.
• Scope is clearly bounded.
• Dependencies and assumptions are identified.

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria.
• User scenarios cover baseline inventory, guard lanes, root-cause repairs, lane/browser decisions, and final CI-signal close-out.
• Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria.
• No implementation detail expands into new product feature scope.

Spec 296 Specific Checks

• failure-inventory.md exists and includes the required columns.
• fix-log.md exists and defines per-file fix logging.
• lane-decisions.md exists and defines default/browser/heavy/wrong-lane decisions.
• browser-evidence.md exists and defines screenshot evidence rules.
• Legacy /admin/t/..., TenantPanelProvider restoration, and /admin/operations fallback routes are explicitly forbidden.
• Workspace-first route generation and OperationRunLinks are named as current truth.
• Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is explicitly covered.
• Provider registration location is explicitly covered as apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php.
• Globally searchable resource review requirements are covered for any touched resource.
• Destructive action confirmation and authorization requirements are covered.
• Asset strategy is documented as unchanged unless unexpected asset registration changes occur.
• Testing plan covers focused files, affected lanes, full suite, browser when touched, Pint, and git diff --check.

Candidate Selection Gate

• Selected candidate is directly provided by the user.
• specs/296-full-suite-green-signal-restoration/ did not already exist before preparation.
• No existing completed Spec 296 was modified.
• Related Specs 293, 294, and 295 were treated as completed/contextual artifacts, not rewritten.
• Candidate aligns with current repo truth from Spec 295: full suite remains red after classification.
• Scope is bounded as a stabilization/cleanup pass, not a new product feature.

Spec Readiness Gate

• spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md exist.
• Required additional artifacts exist.
• Plan identifies likely affected repo surfaces without requiring broad refactors.
• Tasks are ordered, small, and verifiable.
• RBAC, workspace/tenant isolation, provider boundary, OperationRun semantics, browser evidence, and test governance are addressed.
• No open question blocks implementation.

Notes

Preparation analyze found no blocking readiness issue after these artifacts were created.