ahmido
f24e72269c
## Summary - add the Spec 305 docs-only readiness gate package under `specs/305-feature-readiness-gate-audit/` - record a repo-based readiness audit after Specs 301-304 across workspace/admin runtime, environment-bound surfaces, legacy route retirement, governance, OperationRun links, evidence/reports, findings, reviews, RBAC, audit, navigation, and test lanes - document the final recommendation as `GO WITH CONDITIONS` - explicitly block a fresh greenfield `Decision Register & Approval Workflow v1` restart because repo truth already includes Spec 265 runtime and tests - capture the required follow-up: reconcile stale product queue docs or start a narrowly scoped follow-up that builds on existing Decision Register truth ## Scope - docs-only audit artifact plus Spec Kit files - no application runtime changes - no migrations - no UI or route changes - no test edits ## Key Conditions Recorded - do not create a duplicate fresh Decision Register v1 spec - reconcile stale `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` and `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` before using them as queue truth - keep future work on canonical workspace/environment admin routes - split future artifact lifecycle or approval-mutation changes into explicit follow-up specs ## Filament / Runtime Notes - remains compliant with Filament v5 on Livewire v4 - no provider registration changes; provider registration location remains `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - no globally searchable resources were added or changed in this docs-only PR - no destructive actions were added or changed - no asset registration changes; existing deploy posture for `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` is unchanged ## Validation Notes - the audit artifact records the focused repo validation evidence used for the readiness decision - no new runtime validation was executed in this turn beyond committing and pushing the docs-only package Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #360
58 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Checklist: Feature Readiness Gate Audit
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate that Spec 305 remains a docs-only readiness gate and satisfies the user acceptance criteria.
|
|
**Created**: 2026-05-15
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/305-feature-readiness-gate-audit/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Spec Scope
|
|
|
|
- [x] Scope is documentation-only.
|
|
- [x] No runtime code changes are required or planned.
|
|
- [x] No migrations are required or planned.
|
|
- [x] No new UI surfaces are required or planned.
|
|
- [x] No tests are created or modified by this spec.
|
|
- [x] Specs 301-304 are treated as completed context and not reopened.
|
|
- [x] The roadmap is not rewritten.
|
|
- [x] Decision Register & Approval Workflow v1 is not specified or implemented here.
|
|
- [x] Legacy tenant panel compatibility is not reintroduced.
|
|
|
|
## Audit Artifact Requirements
|
|
|
|
- [x] `feature-readiness-audit.md` exists under `specs/305-feature-readiness-gate-audit/`.
|
|
- [x] The audit includes a repo-based matrix covering all 12 requested readiness areas.
|
|
- [x] Matrix statuses use only `ready`, `ready with caveat`, `blocker`, and `not applicable`.
|
|
- [x] Every blocker, if any, has a recommended action.
|
|
- [x] The audit explicitly evaluates whether Decision Register & Approval Workflow v1 may start as the next feature spec.
|
|
- [x] The audit documents a final `GO`, `GO WITH CONDITIONS`, or `NO-GO` recommendation.
|
|
|
|
## Evidence Requirements
|
|
|
|
- [x] Workspace/Admin Runtime readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Environment-bound Surface readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Legacy Route/Panel Retirement readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Governance Feature Foundation readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] OperationRun Link/Execution Truth readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Evidence/StoredReport Artifact Truth readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Findings/Risk Acceptance readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Review/Review Pack readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] RBAC/Capability readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Audit/Event readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Navigation/IA readiness is assessed.
|
|
- [x] Test Lane readiness is assessed.
|
|
|
|
## Validation Requirements
|
|
|
|
- [x] Focused Filament/navigation/legacy route tests from Specs 301-304 are run or explicitly recorded as skipped with reason.
|
|
- [x] Relevant Governance/Findings/Evidence/OpsUx tests are run or explicitly recorded as skipped with reason.
|
|
- [x] `git diff --check` is run.
|
|
- [x] `git status --short` confirms only `specs/305-feature-readiness-gate-audit/` changed.
|
|
- [x] Validation outcomes are copied into `feature-readiness-audit.md`.
|
|
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|
|
|
- [x] Requirements are unambiguous and testable by document review.
|
|
- [x] No implementation detail mandates application changes.
|
|
- [x] Caveats are separated from blockers.
|
|
- [x] Stale product docs are treated as conditions, not as stronger truth than repo code/tests.
|
|
- [x] The next-feature recommendation distinguishes a fresh duplicate Decision Register spec from a legitimate follow-up or close-out path.
|