Implemented sync capture backup operation semantics as requested. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #433
5.0 KiB
5.0 KiB
Requirements Checklist: Spec 362 - Sync, Capture, and Backup Operation Semantics
Purpose: Preparation analysis for Spec 362 readiness
Created: 2026-06-07
Feature: /Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/wt-plattform/specs/362-sync-capture-backup-operation-semantics/spec.md
Candidate Selection And Guardrails
- CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: the direct user-provided Spec 362 draft from
/Users/ahmeddarrazi/.codex/attachments/c6e1919f-3e04-4f47-b6a8-58c0fdc2ab82/pasted-text.txt. - CHK002 No
specs/362-*package existed before Spec Kit branch creation. - CHK003 The active candidate queue's empty-state note is respected; this package is an intentional manual promotion, not an auto-selected queue item.
- CHK004 Related specs were checked and treated correctly: Specs 358, 359, and 361 are implementation context, and Spec 360 remains canonical-cutover context only.
- CHK005 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in
spec.md, especially the narrowed safe scope aroundinventory.sync,baseline.capture, andbackup.schedule.executeplus the explicit defer/fail-closed treatment forpolicy.syncandbackup_set.update.
Required Prep Artifacts
- CHK006
spec.mdexists and contains no template placeholders. - CHK007
plan.mdexists and is repo-aware. - CHK008
tasks.mdexists and is ordered, small, and verifiable. - CHK009 This checklist exists.
Spec Quality
- CHK010 Spec Candidate Check is completed and scores above the approval threshold.
- CHK011 The spec keeps
OperationRun,InventoryItem,BaselineSnapshot,BackupSet, andBackupItempersistence unchanged. - CHK012 The spec explains why bounded adapter extension is justified now under ABSTR-001: the repo already has real registry-backed reconciliation consumers and current proof seams for the selected families.
- CHK013 The spec keeps scope bounded to inventory-sync reconciliation, baseline-capture reconciliation, backup-schedule reconciliation, and honest unsupported-family handling.
- CHK014 The proportionality review rejects a generic sync/backup engine, new operation types, new persistence, and weak "latest artifact exists" heuristics.
Plan / Task Alignment
- CHK015 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change, including the current registry, write seam, proof models, proof presenters, and operations/detail pages.
- CHK016 The plan keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider-registration location visible.
- CHK017 The plan explicitly states that no migration, no new panel/provider, no new global search change, and no new asset strategy are expected.
- CHK018 The tasks start with repo truth and failing tests before runtime edits.
- CHK019 The tasks include explicit anti-creep guardrails against new persistence, new queue families, generic sync/backup heuristics, and unsupported-family widening.
- CHK020 The tasks keep the current
OperationRunlifecycle owner, current presenter/link surfaces, and current workspace-first RBAC model authoritative.
UI / Monitoring / Proof Coverage
- CHK021 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim a new page family.
- CHK022 The changed surfaces are correctly classified as existing operations monitoring/detail plus existing inventory, baseline, and backup detail follow-through, not a new strategic customer-facing page.
- CHK023 No new page-report identity or route-inventory expansion is required unless implementation proves a materially new visible hierarchy.
- CHK024 Audience-aware disclosure and no-overclaim wording boundaries are explicit for operations, run detail, and current proof/detail surfaces.
Test Governance
- CHK025 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Unit + Feature + one bounded Browser smoke.
- CHK026 No heavy-governance family or PGSQL-only schema lane is introduced by default.
- CHK027 Planned validation commands are explicit, partitioned into the primary Spec 362 gate and bounded contextual regressions, and remain scoped to selected-family fallout only.
Readiness Gate Outcome
- CHK028 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
- CHK029 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
- CHK030 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
- CHK031 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.
Review Outcome
- CHK032 Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
- CHK033 Workflow outcome: keep
- CHK034 Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry
Guardrail / Smoke Coverage - CHK035 Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based cross-artifact review; no standalone local
speckit.analyzecommand was exposed in this repo surface beyond prompts and agent instructions - CHK036 Tooling note: Spec Kit branch/spec creation succeeded via
create-new-feature.sh,setup-plan.shgenerated the plan file, andtasks.mdplus this checklist were authored manually to match the repo's Spec Kit templates and agent instructions