ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
9fbd3e5ec7
TenantAtlas/specs/185-workspace-recovery-posture-visibility/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 53e799fea7 Spec 185: workspace recovery posture visibility (#216) 
## Summary
- add Spec 185 workspace recovery posture visibility artifacts under `specs/185-workspace-recovery-posture-visibility`
- promote tenant backup health and recovery evidence onto the workspace overview with separate metrics, attention ordering, calmness coverage, and tenant-dashboard drill-throughs
- batch visible-tenant backup/recovery derivation to keep the workspace overview query-bounded
- align follow-up fixes from the authoritative suite rerun, including dashboard truth-alignment fixtures, canonical backup schedule tenant context, guard-path cleanup, smoke-fixture credential removal, and robust theme asset manifest handling

## Testing
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Filament/PanelThemeAssetTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/DerivedStateConsumerAdoptionGuardTest.php`
- focused regression pack for the previously failing cases passed
- full suite JUnit run passed: `3401` tests, `18849` assertions, `0` failures, `0` errors, `8` skips

## Notes
- no new schema or persisted workspace recovery model
- no provider-registration changes; Filament/Livewire stack remains on Filament v5 and Livewire v4
- no new destructive actions or global search changes

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #216
2026-04-09 12:57:19 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Workspace Recovery Posture Visibility

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-09
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation completed on 2026-04-09.
  • The spec keeps workspace claims explicitly bounded to visible tenants and existing tenant-level backup and recovery truth.
  • No clarification round is required before /speckit.plan.