ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
9fbd3e5ec7
TenantAtlas/specs/186-tenant-registry-recovery-triage/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 9fbd3e5ec7 Spec 186: implement tenant registry recovery triage (#217) 
## Summary
- turn the tenant registry into a workspace-scoped recovery triage surface with backup posture and recovery evidence columns
- preserve workspace overview backup and recovery drilldown intent by routing multi-tenant cases into filtered tenant registry slices
- add the Spec 186 planning artifacts, focused regression coverage, and shared triage presentation helpers

## Testing
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/TenantRegistryRecoveryTriageTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/WorkspaceOverviewSummaryMetricsTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/WorkspaceOverviewDrilldownContinuityTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantResourceIndexIsWorkspaceScopedTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/WorkspaceOverviewAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/FilamentTableStandardsGuardTest.php`

## Notes
- no schema change
- no new persisted recovery truth
- branch includes the full Spec 186 spec, plan, research, data model, contract, quickstart, and tasks artifacts

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #217
2026-04-09 19:20:48 +00:00

1.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Registry Recovery Triage

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-09
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated on 2026-04-09 after correcting the feature number to 186.
  • No clarification markers remain; the spec is ready for /speckit.plan.