ahmido
a089350f98
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 49s
## Summary - unify provider-backed action starts behind the shared provider dispatch gate and shared start-result presenter - align tenant, onboarding, provider-connection, restore, directory, and monitoring surfaces with the same blocked, deduped, scope-busy, and accepted semantics - include the spec kit artifacts for spec 216 and the regression fixes that brought the full suite back to green ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/RestoreRunIdempotencyTest.php tests/Feature/ExecuteRestoreRunJobTest.php tests/Feature/Restore/RestoreRunProviderStartTest.php tests/Feature/Hardening/ExecuteRestoreRunJobGateTest.php tests/Feature/Hardening/BlockedWriteAuditLogTest.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/OnboardingDraftLifecycleTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Browser/Spec177InventoryCoverageTruthSmokeTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact` ## Notes - branch: `216-provider-dispatch-gate` - commit: `34230be7` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #255
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Provider-Backed Action Preflight and Dispatch Gate Unification
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-19
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed on 2026-04-19.
|
|
- The chosen spec is aligned with the active / near-term roadmap lane and the highest-priority unspecced qualified candidate in spec-candidates.md.
|
|
- No clarification questions were needed; the candidate already had sufficient scope, sequencing, and boundary detail for planning readiness. |