ahmido
acc8947384
## Summary - add the Spec 194 governance action catalog, friction classes, reason policies, and regression guards - align exception, review, evidence, finding, tenant, provider connection, and system run actions to the shared semantics model - add focused feature, RBAC, audit, unit, and browser coverage, including the tenant detail triage header consistency update ## Verification - ran the focused Spec 194 verification pack from the quickstart and task plan - ran targeted tenant triage coverage after the detail-header update - ran `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Filament Notes - Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance preserved - provider registration remains in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - globally searchable resources were not changed - destructive actions remain confirmation-gated and server-authorized - no new Filament assets were introduced; the existing `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` deploy step stays unchanged Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #229
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Governance Friction Hardening and Operator Vocabulary
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-12
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Repository-required surface naming, route references, and Filament action-matrix metadata are intentional product-operational constraints for this codebase, not implementation design instructions.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain. Spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`.
|