## Summary - add the checked-in Spec 208 heavy-suite classification and family manifest with config-driven lane generation, attribution, and budget reporting - update Pest grouping, guard coverage, wrapper/report contracts, and spec artifacts for the segmented lane model - complete the targeted follow-up pass that re-homes the remaining in-scope confidence hotspots into explicit heavy-governance families ## Acceptance - confidence is repaired and now measures 389.613832s, down from 587.446894s and below the 450s lane budget - confidence is also slightly below the post-Spec-207 baseline of 394.383441s (delta -4.769609s) - this closes the central Spec 208 acceptance issue that had kept the spec open ## Intentionally Re-homed Families - finding-bulk-actions-workflow - drift-bulk-triage-all-matching - baseline-profile-start-surfaces - workspace-settings-slice-management - findings-workflow-surfaces - workspace-only-admin-surface-independence ## Explicit Residual Risk - heavy-governance now measures 318.296962s, above its documented 300s threshold - the cost was not removed; it was moved into the correct lane and made visible on clearly named heavy families - this is documented residual debt, not an open Spec 208 failure ## Validation - focused guard/support validation: 206 passed (3607 assertions) - lane wrapper/report validation completed for confidence and heavy-governance - no full-suite run was performed in this pass by request Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #241
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Filament/Livewire Heavy Suite Segmentation
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-16
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation completed in one pass on 2026-04-16.
- Filament and Livewire are used as scope-defining names for the affected test families, not as implementation prescriptions.
- The specification remains bounded to repository test-governance behavior and leaves CI wiring to the follow-up planning sequence.