ahmido
a2fdca43fd
## Summary - implement Spec 209 heavy-governance cost recovery end to end - add the heavy-governance contract, hotspot inventory, decomposition, snapshots, budget outcome, and author-guidance surfaces in the shared lane support seams - slim the baseline and findings hotspot families, harden wrapper behavior, and refresh the spec, quickstart, and contract artifacts ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/TestLaneCommandContractTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/OperationLifecycleOpsUxGuardTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCaptureStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCompareStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineActionAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsListFiltersTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingExceptionRenewalTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingWorkflowRowActionsTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingWorkflowViewActionsTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/OperationLifecycleOpsUxGuardTest.php` - `./scripts/platform-sail artisan test --compact` ## Outcome - heavy-governance latest artifacts now agree on an authoritative `330s` threshold with `recalibrated` outcome after the honest rerun - full suite result: `3760 passed`, `8 skipped`, `23535 assertions` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #242
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Heavy Governance Lane Cost Reduction
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-17
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation run: 2026-04-17
|
|
- No template placeholders or [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
|
|
- The spec stays repo-governance-focused: it describes lane behavior, hotspot evidence, and budget outcomes without prescribing language-, framework-, or API-level implementation.
|
|
- The spec keeps Heavy Governance honest by requiring explicit budget recovery or explicit recalibration, rather than silent lane reshuffling.
|
|
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan` |