## Summary - replace the static Inventory Coverage HTML tables with a Filament native searchable, sortable, filterable table on the existing tenant page - normalize supported policy types and foundations into one runtime dataset while preserving centralized badge semantics and the documented read-only action-surface exemption - add the full spec kit artifact set for feature 124 and focused Pest coverage for rendering, search, sort, filters, empty state, and regression-sensitive page copy ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/InventoryCoverageTableTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/InventoryPagesTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/InventoryHubDbOnlyTest.php` ## Filament Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance: yes, this uses Filament v5 table APIs on the existing page and does not introduce any Livewire v3 patterns - Provider registration: unchanged; Laravel 11+ provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - Globally searchable resources: none changed in this feature; no Resource global-search behavior was added or modified - Destructive actions: none; the page remains read-only and only exposes a non-destructive clear-filters empty-state action - Asset strategy: no new panel or shared assets were added, so no `filament:assets` deployment change is required for this feature - Testing plan delivered: focused Filament/Pest coverage for the page table surface plus existing page-load regressions ## Follow-up - Manual dark-mode and badge-regression QA from task `T018` is still pending and should be completed before merge if that check remains mandatory in your review flow. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #151
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Inventory Coverage Interactive Table
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-08
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validated after first drafting pass; no clarification markers remain.
- The spec keeps framework-specific language only where the product requirement explicitly demands native table behavior, without introducing code-level implementation detail.