ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
a4f2629493
TenantAtlas/specs/155-tenant-review-layer/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido a4f2629493 feat: add tenant review layer (#185) 
## Summary
- add the tenant review domain with tenant-scoped review library, canonical workspace review register, lifecycle actions, and review-derived executive pack export
- extend review pack, operations, audit, capability, and badge infrastructure to support review composition, publication, export, and recurring review cycles
- add product backlog and audit documentation updates for tenant review and semantic-clarity follow-up candidates

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact --filter="TenantReview"`
- `CI=1 vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact`

## Notes
- Livewire v4+ compliant via existing Filament v5 stack
- panel providers remain in `bootstrap/providers.php` via existing Laravel 12 structure; no provider registration moved to `bootstrap/app.php`
- `TenantReviewResource` is not globally searchable, so the Filament edit/view global-search constraint does not apply
- destructive review actions use action handlers with confirmation and policy enforcement

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #185
2026-03-21 22:03:01 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Review Layer

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-20
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • This spec intentionally separates tenant-scoped recurring review workflows and executive packs from the later framework-oriented Compliance Readiness layer.
  • Workspace scope is limited to canonical review register behavior in this slice; portfolio dashboards and SLA reporting remain separate future work.