ahmido
77f499b60e
Automated PR created by Codex via Gitea API. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #464
50 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 393 - Evidence Anchor Reconciliation v1
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation planning and execution.
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-20
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/393-evidence-anchor-reconciliation-v1/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No unresolved placeholder markers remain.
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value, product trust, and evidence correctness.
|
|
- [x] Written as product behavior with implementation detail only where needed for correctness and repo alignment.
|
|
- [x] All mandatory repo sections are completed.
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain.
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable.
|
|
- [x] Acceptance scenarios are defined for current, released, customer-safe, and technical evidence behavior.
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified.
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded.
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions are identified.
|
|
|
|
## Constitution And Guardrail Coverage
|
|
|
|
- [x] Spec Candidate Check is completed and scored.
|
|
- [x] Proportionality Review covers the new resolver abstraction.
|
|
- [x] UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are completed.
|
|
- [x] Cross-cutting shared pattern reuse is named.
|
|
- [x] OperationRun UX impact is explicitly N/A for new starts/completions.
|
|
- [x] Provider boundary impact is classified.
|
|
- [x] RBAC, workspace/environment isolation, customer-safe disclosure, and audit/technical separation are addressed.
|
|
- [x] Test governance and validation lanes are documented.
|
|
- [x] Clean-cut no-legacy compatibility posture is explicit.
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` exist.
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows.
|
|
- [x] Functional requirements map to implementation tasks.
|
|
- [x] Tests are included before or alongside implementation tasks.
|
|
- [x] Browser smoke is scoped and justified.
|
|
- [x] No application code was modified during preparation.
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Broad completed specs are read-only context and must not be rewritten.
|
|
- Human product sanity check is required after implementation and browser smoke, not during preparation.
|
|
- If implementation discovers a schema need, spec and plan must be updated before adding migrations.
|