TenantAtlas/specs/200-filament-surface-rules/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido edf7646a18
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 43s
Spec 200: add Filament surface rules constitution (#248)
## Summary
- add Spec 200 for the Filament nativity and custom-surface constitution slice
- amend the shared constitution with native-by-default, fake-native, shared-family, state-layer, reviewer-guidance, and exception language
- add the full Spec 200 artifact set: spec, plan, research, data model, quickstart, tasks, contract, and requirements checklist
- align the operator UX standards doc to the new constitution vocabulary
- remove superseded `001-*` spec artifacts that were replaced by the new feature work

## Validation
- completed consistency analysis across spec, plan, tasks, and contract artifacts
- completed integrated-browser smoke check on the current TenantPilot dashboard
- no runtime tests executed because this is a docs-only governance change

## Notes
- runtime application behavior is intentionally unchanged
- enforcement automation, grep/lint guards, and regression test operationalization remain deferred to Spec 201

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #248
2026-04-18 15:33:26 +00:00

1.6 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: UI/UX Constitution Extension: Filament Nativity & Custom Surface Rules

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-18
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Optional operator-surface classification tables are intentionally omitted because this feature amends repository governance rather than changing a concrete runtime surface.
  • Filament and Livewire terminology is intentional product vocabulary for this constitution slice, not code-level implementation guidance.
  • Validation cross-checked the spec against adjacent Specs 196 through 199 and the existing constitution anchors UI-FIL-001, UI-EX-001, DECIDE-001, UI-REVIEW-001, and HDR-001.