ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
aaaad441fd
TenantAtlas/specs/343-customer-review-attestation-accepted-risk-lifecycle/checklists/requirements.md
Ahmed Darrazi aaaad441fd
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 1m12s
Details
feat: add customer review acknowledgement lifecycle (343)
2026-06-01 19:59:31 +02:00

3.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 343 - Customer Review Attestation & Accepted Risk Lifecycle

Purpose: Validate Spec 343 preparation completeness before implementation.
Created: 2026-06-01
Feature: specs/343-customer-review-attestation-accepted-risk-lifecycle/spec.md

Candidate Selection Gate

  • CHK001 The selected candidate is directly provided by the user as Spec 343 (next step after Spec 342).
  • CHK002 The candidate aligns with current roadmap direction: governance-of-record customer-safe reviewability without a generic GRC rebuild.
  • CHK003 No existing specs/343-* package or branch was found before Spec Kit creation.
  • CHK004 Related specs were checked for completed-spec signals and are treated as context only (326, 329, 337, 342).
  • CHK005 Close alternatives are deferred rather than hidden scope (344–347 follow-up candidates).
  • CHK006 Scope is narrowed to one strategic surface (/admin/reviews/workspace) and one minimal persisted truth addition (acknowledgement) only if missing.

Content Quality

  • CHK007 spec.md defines problem, user value, functional requirements, non-goals, acceptance boundaries, assumptions, risks, and open questions.
  • CHK008 plan.md lists likely affected repo surfaces and separates repo-truth mapping from runtime changes.
  • CHK009 tasks.md is ordered into small phases with explicit test/browser/screenshot/validation tasks.
  • CHK010 Supporting prep artifacts exist: repo-truth-map.md and review-attestation-risk-state-contract.md.
  • CHK011 No unresolved template placeholders remain in spec.md, plan.md, or tasks.md.

Constitution And Scope

  • CHK012 Proportionality review is present and explicitly rejects a generic attestation/GRC framework.
  • CHK013 Persistence is justified via PERSIST-001 for acknowledgement truth (auditable governance-of-record event).
  • CHK014 Workspace/environment isolation and deny-as-not-found semantics are explicit requirements.
  • CHK015 UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are completed for the strategic customer-safe surface.
  • CHK016 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture, panel provider location, destructive-action confirmation rules, asset strategy, and testing plan are explicit.

Plan Quality

  • CHK017 Plan sequencing is repo-truth gate → persistence decision → service/audit → UI wiring → tests/browser → validation.
  • CHK018 Deployment/ops impact is explicit (migration possible; no env/queue/scheduler/assets expected).
  • CHK019 No Graph/provider calls during UI render are enforced by plan constraints.

Task Quality

  • CHK020 Tasks include concrete repo surfaces and avoid inventing runtime paths beyond likely touch points.
  • CHK021 Tasks include Feature/Livewire tests and one bounded Browser smoke (strategic surface).
  • CHK022 Tasks include screenshot artifacts and “unreachable state” handling without faking backend truth.
  • CHK023 Tasks explicitly forbid rewriting completed specs and forbid legal/compliance claim scope creep.

Spec Readiness Gate

  • CHK024 spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md exist.
  • CHK025 Required supporting prep artifacts exist in the spec package.
  • CHK026 Open questions do not block safe implementation because each is resolved via repo-truth-first tasks before runtime changes.
  • CHK027 Scope is bounded enough for a later implementation loop.
  • CHK028 Result: ready for implementation loop.