ahmido
ab6eccaf40
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 48s
## Summary - add derived onboarding readiness to the managed tenant onboarding workflow and multi-draft picker - keep provider-specific permission diagnostics secondary while preserving canonical `Open operation` and existing onboarding action semantics - add spec-kit artifacts for `240-tenant-onboarding-readiness` and align roadmap/spec-candidate planning notes - unify the required-permissions empty state copy to English ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/RequiredPermissions/RequiredPermissionsEmptyStateTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - browser smoke exercised the onboarding picker, route-bound mismatch readiness state, canonical `Open operation` path, and local fixture cleanup ## Notes - branch includes the generated spec artifacts under `specs/240-tenant-onboarding-readiness/` - temporary browser smoke tenants/drafts/runs were cleaned from the local environment after validation Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #277
38 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Self-Service Tenant Onboarding & Connection Readiness
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-25
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Quality pass completed on 2026-04-25.
|
|
- The spec stays intentionally narrow: it reuses existing onboarding session, provider connection, verification, and checkpoint truth and does not introduce new onboarding persistence.
|
|
- Provider-specific Microsoft details remain contextual inside diagnostics instead of becoming new platform-core truth.
|
|
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
|