1.8 KiB
1.8 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: CI Test Matrix & Runtime Budget Enforcement
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-17 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation run: 2026-04-17
- No template placeholders or [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
- The spec stays repository-governance-focused: it defines trigger policy, budget semantics, artifact expectations, and contributor behavior without prescribing language-, framework-, or API-level implementation.
- CI-specific nouns such as lane, artifact, budget, and failure class are treated as domain requirements for the repository validation contract rather than low-level implementation detail.
- The scope remains intentionally narrow: it operationalizes the existing governance work from Specs 206 through 209 instead of inventing a second test-execution model.
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before
/speckit.clarifyor/speckit.plan.