ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
acc8947384
TenantAtlas/specs/194-governance-friction-hardening/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido acc8947384 feat: harden governance action semantics (#229) 
## Summary
- add the Spec 194 governance action catalog, friction classes, reason policies, and regression guards
- align exception, review, evidence, finding, tenant, provider connection, and system run actions to the shared semantics model
- add focused feature, RBAC, audit, unit, and browser coverage, including the tenant detail triage header consistency update

## Verification
- ran the focused Spec 194 verification pack from the quickstart and task plan
- ran targeted tenant triage coverage after the detail-header update
- ran `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Filament Notes
- Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance preserved
- provider registration remains in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php`
- globally searchable resources were not changed
- destructive actions remain confirmation-gated and server-authorized
- no new Filament assets were introduced; the existing `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` deploy step stays unchanged

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #229
2026-04-12 21:21:44 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Governance Friction Hardening and Operator Vocabulary

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-12
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Repository-required surface naming, route references, and Filament action-matrix metadata are intentional product-operational constraints for this codebase, not implementation design instructions.
  • No clarification markers remain. Spec is ready for /speckit.plan.