TenantAtlas/docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-006-customer-review-workspace.md

UI-006 Customer Review Workspace

Field	Value
Route	/admin/reviews/workspace
Source	CustomerReviewWorkspace
Area / scope	Customer review / workspace
Archetype	Customer Workspace
Design depth	Strategic Surface
Repo truth	repo-verified
Screenshot	../screenshots/desktop/ui-006-customer-review-workspace.png
Browser status	Reached through local workspace route.

First Five Seconds

This is the most important customer-safe productization candidate. The page should answer what the customer can trust, what changed, what risks are accepted, which evidence supports the state, and what should happen next.

Spec 344 tightens the hierarchy so the Operator Summary (decision + acknowledgement + findings signal) comes first, while the review consumption flow and proof panels remain available as supporting details.

Productization Review

• Decision-first: improved by explicit Operator Summary-first hierarchy.
• Evidence-first: must anchor all claims to review/evidence artifacts.
• Context: workspace-level customer view.
• Customer/auditor safety: primary concern.
• Diagnostics: raw/internal details must stay hidden by default.

Information Inventory

Default content should include review readiness, review acknowledgement (attestation) state + action, evidence basis, accepted risk summary, decision summary, review-pack download, and a management-readable next action.

Dangerous Actions

Customer-facing surface should be read-first. Export/download and publish/review actions need clear scope, audit, and language. The acknowledgement action is a write/mutation action and must remain confirmation-gated, capability-gated, and auditable, without legal/e-signature semantics.

Scores

IA	Density	User Clarity	Sellability	Disclosure	Hierarchy	DS Fit	A11y	Responsive	Components	UX Writing	Perf
3	4	4	5	3	4	4	3	3	4	3	4

Top Issues

1. Acknowledgement copy must remain customer-safe and explicitly non-legal (no compliance certification semantics).
2. Evidence and accepted-risk meaning should be visible without raw diagnostics.
3. Sidebar proof panels can still compete visually with the main decision flow; keep them secondary and avoid duplicating “ready/available” signals at equal weight.

Target Direction

Spec 344 implements the first density/hierarchy polish wave. If the surface still feels too dense after real operator use, follow up with a targeted mockup and a second, narrower polish pass rather than adding new workflow surfaces.

Spec 347 Follow-up

Spec 347 hardens the Review Pack output contract and aligns the workspace with the review-pack ZIP semantics instead of collapsing everything into a generic "ready" claim.

• Decision-card status is now contract-backed and qualified:
  • Kundensicheres Review-Paket bereit / Customer-safe review pack ready
  • Veröffentlicht mit Einschränkungen / Published with limitations
  • Internes Review-Paket verfügbar / Internal review package available
  • Export nicht bereit / Export not ready
• Review-pack proof now exposes evidence basis state, section completeness, sharing boundary, PII visibility, protected-values status, disclosure presence, and operation proof in one bounded panel.
• Download labels are qualified by the same readiness contract instead of implying customer-safe sharing when evidence or section completeness is incomplete.
• The workspace continues to keep diagnostics collapsed and secondary.

Browser proof

• Spec347 screenshots: specs/347-review-pack-output-contract-readiness-semantics/artifacts/screenshots/
• Verified states:
  • customer-safe ready
  • published with limitations
  • internal-only / PII-bearing export

Deferred

• The review-pack detail resource and surrounding environment-review detail copy remain intentionally narrow; Spec 347 only touches the workspace/readiness path and supporting handoff copy where needed for contract consistency.

Spec 349 Follow-up

Spec 349 productizes the raw Spec-347 readiness semantics into bounded operator guidance instead of exposing a warning wall.

• The top decision card now resolves to one dominant output state and one dominant next action:
  • Output not customer-ready
  • Published with limitations
  • Internal review package available
  • Customer-safe review pack ready
• Multiple readiness limitations are grouped behind one compact disclosure instead of competing as peer alerts.
• Technical details stay collapsed by default and remain available as secondary proof.
• Download labels are now readiness-qualified across workspace and customer-workspace detail surfaces:
  • Download customer-safe review pack
  • Download internal review pack
  • Download review pack with limitations
• Environment Review detail now separates:
  • Review status
  • Output readiness
  • Publication/sharing state

Browser proof

• Spec349 screenshots: specs/349-customer-review-workspace-output-resolution-guidance/artifacts/screenshots/
• Verified states:
  • output blocked / publication-blocked guidance
  • internal-only / PII-bearing export
  • customer-safe ready
  • limitations and technical-details disclosures collapsed by default

Repo-truth note

• The user-draft audit-doc target ui-009-review-pack-output-contract.md conflicts with repo truth.
• ui-009 is already reserved for Provider Connections, so Spec 349 keeps the durable audit update on ui-006-customer-review-workspace.md.