ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
acdb205e1b
TenantAtlas/specs/349-customer-review-workspace-output-resolution-guidance/checklists/requirements.md
Ahmed Darrazi acdb205e1b
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 3m42s
Details
feat: customer review workspace output resolution guidance (spec 349) 
Implemented the output resolution guidance for the customer review workspace and internal views. Added ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance, updated CustomerReviewWorkspace and EnvironmentReviewResource, and added related blade views and tests.
2026-06-03 03:31:29 +02:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Requirements Checklist: Spec 349 - Customer Review Workspace Output Resolution Guidance

Purpose: Validate that Spec 349 is bounded, repo-based, constitution-aligned, and ready for later implementation.
Created: 2026-06-03
Feature: specs/349-customer-review-workspace-output-resolution-guidance/spec.md

Candidate Selection And Scope

  • CHK001 The package names the direct user-provided candidate source and its roadmap alignment with Customer Review Workspace v1 completion.
  • CHK002 Completed adjacent specs are treated as historical context only and are not reopened or normalized.
  • CHK003 The scope is narrowed to output-guidance productization over existing readiness truth, workspace, and review detail surfaces only.
  • CHK004 Explicit non-goals block a workflow engine, persistence, portal, renderer, and broad surface redesign.

Repo Truth And Architecture

  • CHK005 The spec and plan anchor the work to the existing ReviewPackOutputReadiness truth and current scoped routes.
  • CHK006 The artifacts state that any new guidance state remains derived-only and not a persisted domain state.
  • CHK007 The plan avoids inventing a new route family, hidden shell context, or second raw-readiness dialect.
  • CHK008 The user-draft conflict around ui-009-review-pack-output-contract.md is corrected explicitly in the spec and repo-truth map.

UI/Productization Coverage

  • CHK009 UI Surface Impact is explicit and consistent with the intended workspace/detail changes.
  • CHK010 UI/Productization Coverage identifies the existing strategic workspace page report and avoids inventing new route/archetype coverage unnecessarily.
  • CHK011 The spec requires one dominant output state and one dominant next action rather than many equal-weight warnings.
  • CHK012 Audience-aware disclosure keeps technical details secondary and customer-safe wording conservative.

Testing And Validation

  • CHK013 Planned tests cover workspace guidance, review-pack resolution mapping, detail-surface separation, and one bounded browser smoke.
  • CHK014 The validation commands explicitly rerun Spec 347 regressions plus filtered workspace/review-pack coverage.
  • CHK015 The artifacts name pint --dirty and git diff --check as final prep-aligned validation steps.

Review Outcome

  • CHK016 Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • CHK017 Workflow outcome: keep
  • CHK018 Final note location is the active feature PR close-out entry Guardrail / Smoke Coverage.

Notes

  • This checklist validates preparation readiness only. No application implementation has been performed.
  • The remaining implementation choice is intentionally narrow: extend ReviewPackOutputReadiness directly or wrap it with one bounded guidance adapter.