TenantAtlas/specs/144-canonical-operation-viewer-context-decoupling/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido b0a724acef feat: harden canonical run viewer and onboarding draft state (#173)
## Summary
- harden the canonical operation run viewer so mismatched, missing, archived, onboarding, and selector-excluded tenant context no longer invalidates authorized canonical run viewing
- extend canonical route, header-context, deep-link, and presentation coverage for Spec 144 and add the full spec artifact set under `specs/144-canonical-operation-viewer-context-decoupling/`
- harden onboarding draft provider-connection resume logic so stale persisted provider connections fall back to the connect-provider step instead of resuming invalid state
- add architecture-audit follow-up candidate material and prompt assets for the next governance hardening wave

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/144/CanonicalOperationViewerContextMismatchTest.php tests/Feature/144/CanonicalOperationViewerDeepLinkTrustTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/TenantlessOperationRunViewerTest.php tests/Feature/OpsUx/OperateHubShellTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/OperationsTenantScopeTest.php tests/Feature/RunAuthorizationTenantIsolationTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/OperationRunEnterpriseDetailPageTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/HeaderContextBarTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/OperationRunResolvedReferencePresentationTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/OperationsCanonicalUrlsTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/ManagedTenantOnboardingWizardTest.php tests/Unit/Onboarding/OnboardingDraftStageResolverTest.php tests/Unit/Onboarding/OnboardingLifecycleServiceTest.php`

## Notes
- branch: `144-canonical-operation-viewer-context-decoupling`
- base: `dev`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #173
2026-03-15 18:32:04 +00:00

1.5 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Canonical Operation Viewer Context Decoupling

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-15
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed on 2026-03-15 after replacing the scaffolded template with a complete draft.
  • The spec stays at policy and UX-contract level: it defines route legitimacy, authorization semantics, deep-link behavior, and messaging expectations without prescribing code structure.
  • No clarification markers remain. The draft assumes existing canonical run links and capability registry stay in place while this feature hardens their trust semantics.