ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
b13a43ba30
TenantAtlas/specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces/checklists/requirements.md
Ahmed Darrazi b13a43ba30
Some checks failed
PR Fast Feedback / fast-feedback (pull_request) Failing after 56s
Details
refactor: remove findings lifecycle backfill runtime surfaces 
## Summary
- decommission the legacy findings lifecycle backfill substrate across command, job, service, and UI layers
- remove related platform capabilities, operation catalog entries, and action surface exemptions
- add regression and removal verification tests to ensure runtime integrity and surface absence
- include spec, plan, tasks, and data-model artifacts for the removal slice

## Scope
- active spec: specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces
- target branch: dev

## Validation
- integrated regression and removal verification tests for console, findings, and system ops surfaces
- audit log and capability trace verification for the removal path
2026-04-28 23:47:16 +02:00

2.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Remove Findings Lifecycle Backfill Runtime Surfaces

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-28
Feature: specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No language/framework/API design leakage; concrete repo surfaces, commands, and labels are named only because this cleanup deletes those exact shipped traces.
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No unintended implementation design leakage remains beyond the explicit cleanup special-case for named repo-visible traces

Test Governance Review

  • Lane fit is explicit: the package uses fast-feedback and confidence, plus one retained heavy-governance guard in apps/platform/tests/Feature/OperationalControls/NoAdHocOperationalControlBypassTest.php so operational-control bypass residue cannot survive the cleanup silently.
  • No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; the retained guard stays explicit, bounded, and tied to operational-control source-trace removal only.
  • Suite-cost outcome is net-negative: backfill-only tests, lane traces, and helper residue are removed in the same slice instead of widening shared defaults.

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • Workflow outcome: keep
  • Review-note location is explicit: the heavy-governance retention note lives in spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and the final preparation report.

Notes

  • The spec intentionally names concrete routes, commands, labels, and catalog keys because the product value of this slice is the removal of those specific repo-visible runtime surfaces.
  • The slice stays small by deleting visible repair tooling only; acknowledged-status cleanup and creation-time invariant hardening remain explicit follow-up candidates.
  • Validation pass complete: no clarification markers remain, LEAN-001 cleanup posture is explicit, and tenant-owned findings continue to treat workspace_id plus tenant_id as required anchors.