ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
b182f55562
TenantAtlas/specs/116-baseline-drift-engine/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 7620144ab6 Spec 116: Baseline drift engine v1 (meta fidelity + coverage guard) (#141) 
Implements Spec 116 baseline drift engine v1 (meta fidelity) with coverage guard, stable finding identity, and Filament UI surfaces.

Highlights
- Baseline capture/compare jobs and supporting services (meta contract hashing via InventoryMetaContract + DriftHasher)
- Coverage proof parsing + compare partial outcome behavior
- Filament pages/resources/widgets for baseline compare + drift landing improvements
- Pest tests for capture/compare/coverage guard and UI start surfaces
- Research report: docs/research/golden-master-baseline-drift-deep-analysis.md

Validation
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact --filter="Baseline"`

Notes
- No destructive user actions added; compare/capture remain queued jobs.
- Provider registration unchanged (Laravel 11+/12 uses bootstrap/providers.php for panel providers; not touched here).

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #141
2026-03-02 22:02:58 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Drift Engine (Final Architecture)

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-01 Feature: specs/116-baseline-drift-engine/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan
  • This spec uses internal domain terms like “Operation run”, “capability”, and “hash fidelity” intentionally; they are defined in-context and treated as product concepts rather than framework implementation.