ahmido
3ce1cae71e
Implemented restore high risk operation reconciliation. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #435
91 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
91 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 364 - Restore and High-Risk Operation Reconciliation
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-07
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/364-restore-high-risk-operation-reconciliation/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection Gate
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided Spec 364 draft from `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/.codex/attachments/fe416f8b-141a-44eb-ae89-ab62a4691bed/pasted-text.txt`.
|
|
- [x] CHK002 No `specs/364-*` package existed before SpecKit branch creation.
|
|
- [x] CHK003 No local or remote `364-*` branch was detected before SpecKit branch creation.
|
|
- [x] CHK004 The active candidate queue's empty-state note is respected; this package is an intentional manual promotion, not an auto-selected backlog item.
|
|
- [x] CHK005 Related completed specs are treated as context only: Specs 333, 335, and 358-363 are not rewritten, unchecked, normalized, or reopened.
|
|
- [x] CHK006 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in `spec.md`, especially no new `verification_required` OperationRun outcome and no new `restore.verify` operation type.
|
|
- [x] CHK007 Close alternatives are deferred explicitly instead of hidden inside Spec 364.
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK008 `spec.md` exists and contains no template placeholders.
|
|
- [x] CHK009 `plan.md` exists and is repo-aware.
|
|
- [x] CHK010 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
|
|
- [x] CHK011 This checklist exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK012 No application implementation is included in the preparation artifacts.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK013 Spec Candidate Check is completed and scored above the approval threshold.
|
|
- [x] CHK014 Problem, today's failure, user-visible improvement, smallest version, non-goals, complexity, why-now, and why-not-local are explicit.
|
|
- [x] CHK015 User stories are prioritized and independently testable.
|
|
- [x] CHK016 Functional requirements are testable and unambiguous.
|
|
- [x] CHK017 Success criteria are measurable.
|
|
- [x] CHK018 Edge cases, assumptions, risks, and follow-up candidates are documented.
|
|
- [x] CHK019 No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain.
|
|
|
|
## Constitution Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK020 The spec keeps `OperationRun`, `RestoreRun`, and audit persistence unchanged.
|
|
- [x] CHK021 The spec forbids a new `OperationRunOutcome`, `OperationRunStatus`, restore operation type, restore verification table, Graph contract, or high-risk framework.
|
|
- [x] CHK022 The proportionality review explains why restore-specific proof hardening is justified now.
|
|
- [x] CHK023 The plan keeps Graph calls out of reconciliation and render paths.
|
|
- [x] CHK024 The plan preserves service-owned OperationRun lifecycle writes.
|
|
- [x] CHK025 RBAC, workspace isolation, managed-environment isolation, and deny-as-not-found boundaries are explicit.
|
|
- [x] CHK026 Provider boundary classification is explicit and keeps Microsoft/Intune restore semantics provider-owned.
|
|
- [x] CHK027 Audit metadata safety is explicit: no secrets, credentials, or raw provider payloads.
|
|
|
|
## UI / Filament / Ops UX
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK028 UI Surface Impact is completed and classifies existing Operations and Restore surfaces.
|
|
- [x] CHK029 UI/Productization Coverage explains why no new route/page family is expected.
|
|
- [x] CHK030 OperationRun UX Impact is completed and reuses shared OperationRun start/completion/link behavior.
|
|
- [x] CHK031 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is explicit in the plan.
|
|
- [x] CHK032 Laravel 12 Filament provider location remains `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php`.
|
|
- [x] CHK033 Global search impact is explicit: no resource global-search change expected.
|
|
- [x] CHK034 Destructive/high-impact restore action handling is explicit: existing action path must retain `->action(...)`, `->requiresConfirmation()`, server authorization, audit, and tests.
|
|
- [x] CHK035 Asset strategy is explicit: no new assets expected; `filament:assets` only if future implementation unexpectedly registers assets.
|
|
|
|
## Tasks Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK036 Tasks start with repo truth and failing tests before runtime edits.
|
|
- [x] CHK037 Tasks include Unit, Feature, optional Browser, validation, formatting, and close-out work.
|
|
- [x] CHK038 Tasks include anti-creep guardrails against new outcomes, operation types, persistence, Graph contracts, and generic high-risk frameworking.
|
|
- [x] CHK039 Tasks are small enough for a bounded later implementation loop.
|
|
- [x] CHK040 Tasks include explicit validation commands.
|
|
|
|
## Preparation Analyze Result
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK041 Cross-artifact terminology is consistent across `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md`: `restore.execute`, proof bundle, verification gap, OperationRun, RestoreRun, managed environment, and existing outcomes.
|
|
- [x] CHK042 Requirements map to tasks: success proof, preview-only rejection, missing-proof handling, partial/blocked/failed mapping, wrong-scope safety, visible fallout, unsupported family guard, and validation are all covered.
|
|
- [x] CHK043 Tasks do not require scope missing from the spec.
|
|
- [x] CHK044 Plan surfaces do not contradict current repo architecture.
|
|
- [x] CHK045 No open question blocks safe implementation.
|
|
- [x] CHK046 Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based cross-artifact review; no standalone local `speckit.analyze` generator command was exposed in this repo surface beyond prompts and agent instructions.
|
|
- [x] CHK047 Tooling note: SpecKit branch/spec creation succeeded via `create-new-feature.sh`; `setup-plan.sh` generated `plan.md`; `tasks.md` and this checklist were authored manually to match repo templates and agent instructions.
|
|
- [x] CHK048 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: the success proof bundle now has repo-real sources, missing-proof outcomes, and reason-code guidance.
|
|
- [x] CHK049 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: `not_reconciled` is clarified as a non-final `ReconciliationResult` decision, not an OperationRun outcome.
|
|
- [x] CHK050 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: tasks explicitly cover missing audit continuity and soft-deleted RestoreRun proof.
|
|
- [x] CHK051 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: Browser classification is conditional on visible hierarchy changes.
|
|
|
|
## Gate Results
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK052 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK053 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK054 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
|
|
- [x] CHK055 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] Outcome class: acceptable-special-case.
|
|
- [x] Workflow outcome: keep.
|
|
- [x] Final note location for implementation PR: `Guardrail / Exception / Smoke Coverage`.
|