Automated PR created by Codex via Gitea API. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #460
69 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Quality Checklist
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: 389 - Governance Inbox Resolution Intake v1
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-19
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate that the Spec 389 artifacts are ready for a later implementation loop.
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation code is mixed into the specification.
|
|
- [x] User value and operator workflow are stated clearly.
|
|
- [x] Non-goals explicitly exclude generic workflow/task/adapter engines.
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable.
|
|
- [x] Acceptance criteria are measurable.
|
|
- [x] Customer-facing exclusion is explicit.
|
|
- [x] OperationRun disclosure constraints are explicit.
|
|
- [x] Currentness fallback behavior is explicit.
|
|
- [x] No unresolved clarification markers remain.
|
|
- [x] UI Action Matrix is present for the changed operator-facing surface.
|
|
- [x] UI coverage artifact decision is explicit for this pattern-reusing extension.
|
|
- [x] Updated-date filter presets are bounded for v1.
|
|
- [x] OperationRun primary action eligibility is constrained to validated waiting items.
|
|
- [x] No-migration validation is represented as a numbered implementation task.
|
|
|
|
## Scope Control
|
|
|
|
- [x] The spec targets the existing Governance Inbox.
|
|
- [x] No new top-level navigation is required.
|
|
- [x] No new global-search Resource is required.
|
|
- [x] No new persisted entity is required.
|
|
- [x] No migration is recommended by default.
|
|
- [x] Inline mutation, publish, cancel, refresh, report update, evidence collection, and export preparation actions are out of scope.
|
|
- [x] Future restore/provider/baseline/report-delivery intakes are deferred to later specs.
|
|
|
|
## Constitution and Product Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- [x] Governance Inbox remains read-only.
|
|
- [x] Spec 388 proof/currentness remains authoritative.
|
|
- [x] Unknown or unsafe state falls back to `Needs re-check`.
|
|
- [x] Viewer-relative inbox status is not persisted.
|
|
- [x] Workspace and environment isolation are required.
|
|
- [x] Capability-first RBAC is required.
|
|
- [x] Raw provider, Graph, evidence, report, exception, token, secret, fingerprint, proof reason, and raw operation metadata are excluded from default UI/audit.
|
|
- [x] OperationRun permission is necessary but not sufficient for link disclosure.
|
|
|
|
## Filament / UI Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] Filament v5 and Livewire v4.1.4 compatibility is documented in `plan.md`.
|
|
- [x] Panel provider registration impact is documented as none.
|
|
- [x] Global search impact is documented as none.
|
|
- [x] Destructive action impact is documented as none in the Inbox.
|
|
- [x] Asset strategy is documented as no new Filament assets expected.
|
|
- [x] Testing plan includes Feature/Filament tests and optional Browser smoke.
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] `spec.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] `plan.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] `tasks.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] `contracts/review-publication-resolution-inbox-item.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] `contracts/status-mapping.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] `artifacts/current-governance-inbox-inventory.md` exists.
|
|
|
|
## Residual Assumptions
|
|
|
|
- [x] Spec 386, 387, and 388 foundations are stable enough for consumption on the current baseline.
|
|
- [x] Existing Governance Inbox entry rendering can express the new source family without a new page.
|
|
- [x] Existing Spec 386 indexes are sufficient until implementation proves otherwise.
|
|
- [x] Browser harness availability is implementation-time dependent.
|