ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
b3e6dfdb7c
TenantAtlas/specs/393-evidence-anchor-reconciliation-v1/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 77f499b60e feat: add evidence anchor reconciliation contracts and readiness fixes (#464) 
Automated PR created by Codex via Gitea API.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #464
2026-06-21 09:39:14 +00:00

2.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 393 - Evidence Anchor Reconciliation v1

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation planning and execution. Created: 2026-06-20 Feature: specs/393-evidence-anchor-reconciliation-v1/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No unresolved placeholder markers remain.
  • Focused on user value, product trust, and evidence correctness.
  • Written as product behavior with implementation detail only where needed for correctness and repo alignment.
  • All mandatory repo sections are completed.

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
  • Success criteria are measurable.
  • Acceptance scenarios are defined for current, released, customer-safe, and technical evidence behavior.
  • Edge cases are identified.
  • Scope is clearly bounded.
  • Dependencies and assumptions are identified.

Constitution And Guardrail Coverage

  • Spec Candidate Check is completed and scored.
  • Proportionality Review covers the new resolver abstraction.
  • UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are completed.
  • Cross-cutting shared pattern reuse is named.
  • OperationRun UX impact is explicitly N/A for new starts/completions.
  • Provider boundary impact is classified.
  • RBAC, workspace/environment isolation, customer-safe disclosure, and audit/technical separation are addressed.
  • Test governance and validation lanes are documented.
  • Clean-cut no-legacy compatibility posture is explicit.

Feature Readiness

  • spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md exist.
  • User scenarios cover primary flows.
  • Functional requirements map to implementation tasks.
  • Tests are included before or alongside implementation tasks.
  • Browser smoke is scoped and justified.
  • No application code was modified during preparation.

Notes

  • Broad completed specs are read-only context and must not be rewritten.
  • Human product sanity check is required after implementation and browser smoke, not during preparation.
  • If implementation discovers a schema need, spec and plan must be updated before adding migrations.