ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
b3e6dfdb7c
TenantAtlas/specs/400-product-contract-spec-completeness-audit/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 23225434ad spec: add completeness audit spec artifacts for product contract (#471) 
Automated PR provided by Codex via Gitea API.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #471
2026-06-22 21:36:59 +00:00

2.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 400 - Product Contract & Spec Completeness Audit

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation preparation is handed off. Created: 2026-06-22 Feature: specs/400-product-contract-spec-completeness-audit/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No application implementation details are prescribed beyond read-only inspection targets.
  • Focused on product value, operator trust, and customer-ready productization risk.
  • Written as an audit/promotion gate that product and engineering reviewers can evaluate.
  • Mandatory Spec Kit sections are completed or explicitly marked N/A with rationale.

Requirement Completeness

  • No unresolved clarification markers remain.
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous for a read-only audit.
  • Success criteria are measurable.
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic except for repo-path evidence references.
  • Acceptance scenarios are defined.
  • Edge cases are identified.
  • Scope is clearly bounded to audit/reporting and excludes implementation.
  • Dependencies and assumptions are identified.

Feature Readiness

  • Functional requirements map to the final audit report structure.
  • User scenarios cover gate result, surface matrix, decision debt, hallucination risk, and follow-up grouping.
  • The feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria.
  • No runtime implementation is required to execute the audit.

Constitution And Product Surface Readiness

  • Spec Candidate Check is completed with approval class, score, and decision.
  • Completed-spec guardrail is explicit.
  • No UI surface impact is checked with a clear rationale.
  • Product Surface Contract is applied as an audit standard, not as runtime change.
  • Browser verification is N/A - no rendered UI surface changed for preparation.
  • Human Product Sanity is scoped to final-report sanity, not rendered UI.
  • Proportionality review states report-only outputs and no runtime framework.
  • Test governance states no tests, lanes, fixtures, or browser families are added.

Notes

Preparation review result: pass. The package is ready for a separate read-only audit execution, provided the audit agent preserves the no-implementation boundary and records dirty state before/after.