92 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
92 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Checklist: Spec 407 - Full Browser/UX Runtime Audit
|
|
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/407-full-browser-ux-runtime-audit/`
|
|
**Review date**: 2026-06-24
|
|
**Scope**: Preparation artifact quality only. No application implementation performed.
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection Gate
|
|
|
|
- [x] The selected candidate was directly provided by the operator as Spec 407.
|
|
- [x] `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` was reviewed and reports no safe automatic next-best-prep target.
|
|
- [x] The candidate aligns with the supplied after-Specs-400-406 browser/runtime gate.
|
|
- [x] The roadmap supports a broad readiness gate before pilot/customer-facing claims.
|
|
- [x] Specs 400-406 are treated as read-only lineage.
|
|
- [x] Spec 403 `PASS`, Spec 404/405 `PASS WITH CONDITIONS`, and Spec 406 `PASS WITH CONDITIONS` are carried forward honestly.
|
|
- [x] No existing `specs/407-full-browser-ux-runtime-audit/` package existed before preparation.
|
|
- [x] Existing branch `407-msp-mittelstand-use-case-pages` is recorded as unrelated.
|
|
- [x] The smallest slice is a read-only browser/runtime audit and final readiness report.
|
|
- [x] Close alternatives are deferred instead of hidden inside this package.
|
|
- [x] Candidate Selection Gate result: PASS as a direct operator-promoted follow-through candidate.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] Problem statement is clear and product-oriented.
|
|
- [x] Business/product value is explicit.
|
|
- [x] Primary users/operators are named.
|
|
- [x] Scope fields cover routes/surfaces, ownership, RBAC, and leakage checks.
|
|
- [x] Functional requirements are testable.
|
|
- [x] Non-functional requirements cover security, reliability, auditability, performance, product safety, and test governance.
|
|
- [x] User stories include independent tests and acceptance criteria.
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are documented.
|
|
- [x] Out-of-scope boundaries forbid fixes, runtime changes, tests, fixtures, destructive actions, saved docs by default, and completed-spec rewrites.
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable.
|
|
- [x] Assumptions, risks, and open questions are explicit.
|
|
|
|
## Constitution And Proportionality
|
|
|
|
- [x] Spec Candidate Check is filled out.
|
|
- [x] Approval class is exactly one class: Core Enterprise.
|
|
- [x] Score is recorded and above the minimum threshold.
|
|
- [x] Proportionality Review is completed.
|
|
- [x] The report/matrix/severity outputs are explicitly report-only and not runtime truth.
|
|
- [x] No persisted entity, table, enum, status family, abstraction, UI framework, or product taxonomy is approved.
|
|
- [x] The spec requires stopping before implementation or product-decision invention.
|
|
- [x] Completed historical specs are preserved as read-only context.
|
|
|
|
## Product Surface Contract
|
|
|
|
- [x] `docs/product/standards/product-surface-contract.md` is referenced.
|
|
- [x] No-legacy posture is recorded.
|
|
- [x] UI Surface Impact is `No UI surface impact` with rationale.
|
|
- [x] Product Surface Impact is completed as audit-only.
|
|
- [x] Page archetypes, surface budgets, deep-link demotion, and canonical vocabulary are audit criteria.
|
|
- [x] Browser proof is required as the audit output.
|
|
- [x] Human Product Sanity is required for the final report.
|
|
- [x] Product Surface exceptions are `none` for preparation.
|
|
- [x] Final report close-out fields are required.
|
|
|
|
## Plan Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] Plan identifies PHP/Laravel/Filament/Livewire/Pest/PostgreSQL/Sail context.
|
|
- [x] Plan names existing runtime surfaces likely inspected.
|
|
- [x] Plan distinguishes read-only browser audit from runtime implementation.
|
|
- [x] Plan includes UI/Product Surface, Filament/Livewire/deployment, RBAC, audit, evidence/currentness, OperationRun, lifecycle, and test-governance posture.
|
|
- [x] Plan defines audit method, output strategy, stop conditions, phases, and risk controls.
|
|
- [x] Plan carries Spec 404/405 and Spec 406 conditions forward.
|
|
- [x] Plan does not contradict repository architecture or current code truth.
|
|
|
|
## Task Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] Tasks are ordered by safety, inventory, browser walkthrough, journey matrix, findings, summaries, readiness decision, and close-out.
|
|
- [x] Tasks are small and verifiable.
|
|
- [x] Tasks include dirty-state checks before/after.
|
|
- [x] Tasks include actor/fixture availability checks.
|
|
- [x] Tasks include required surface and journey coverage.
|
|
- [x] Tasks include severity/category finding classification.
|
|
- [x] Tasks include Product Surface and Filament output-contract close-out fields.
|
|
- [x] Tasks include explicit non-goals preventing implementation and mutation.
|
|
- [x] Tasks include final validation commands and no-implementation proof.
|
|
|
|
## Open Questions And Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No open question blocks starting the audit; unavailable actors, fixtures, services, or routes are recorded as limitations.
|
|
- [x] Saved audit artifact policy is explicit: response-only by default, spec-local file only by operator request.
|
|
- [x] Spec Readiness Gate result: PASS for implementation preparation.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] Review outcome class: `acceptable-special-case` for a broad but read-only customer-readiness browser audit gate.
|
|
- [x] Workflow outcome: `keep`.
|
|
- [x] Final note location: future Spec 407 final audit report.
|
|
- [x] No application implementation was performed during preparation.
|