ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
b6343d5c3a
TenantAtlas/specs/073-unified-managed-tenant-onboarding-wizard/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido b6343d5c3a feat: unified managed tenant onboarding wizard (#88) 
Implements workspace-scoped managed tenant onboarding wizard (Filament v5 / Livewire v4) with strict RBAC (404/403 semantics), resumable sessions, provider connection selection/creation, verification OperationRun, and optional bootstrap. Removes legacy onboarding entrypoints and adds Pest coverage + spec artifacts (073).

## Summary
<!-- Kurz: Was ändert sich und warum? -->

## Spec-Driven Development (SDD)
- [ ] Es gibt eine Spec unter `specs/<NNN>-<feature>/`
- [ ] Enthaltene Dateien: `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `spec.md`
- [ ] Spec beschreibt Verhalten/Acceptance Criteria (nicht nur Implementation)
- [ ] Wenn sich Anforderungen während der Umsetzung geändert haben: Spec/Plan/Tasks wurden aktualisiert

## Implementation
- [ ] Implementierung entspricht der Spec
- [ ] Edge cases / Fehlerfälle berücksichtigt
- [ ] Keine unbeabsichtigten Änderungen außerhalb des Scopes

## Tests
- [ ] Tests ergänzt/aktualisiert (Pest/PHPUnit)
- [ ] Relevante Tests lokal ausgeführt (`./vendor/bin/sail artisan test` oder `php artisan test`)

## Migration / Config / Ops (falls relevant)
- [ ] Migration(en) enthalten und getestet
- [ ] Rollback bedacht (rückwärts kompatibel, sichere Migration)
- [ ] Neue Env Vars dokumentiert (`.env.example` / Doku)
- [ ] Queue/cron/storage Auswirkungen geprüft

## UI (Filament/Livewire) (falls relevant)
- [ ] UI-Flows geprüft
- [ ] Screenshots/Notizen hinzugefügt

## Notes
<!-- Links, Screenshots, Follow-ups, offene Punkte -->

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@adsmac.fritz.box>
Reviewed-on: #88
2026-02-03 17:30:15 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Unified Managed Tenant Onboarding Wizard (073)

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-02-03
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • All checklist items pass.
  • The constitution-alignment paragraphs reference platform primitives (e.g., OperationRun) and domain integrations (e.g., Microsoft Graph) as required by this repository’s constitution.
  • Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan