37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Test Suite Governance & Performance Foundation
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-16
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation run: 2026-04-16
|
|
- The spec stays focused on repository governance outcomes: lane definitions, honest taxonomy, cheap shared defaults, slow-test visibility, and runtime budgets.
|
|
- Runtime budgets are intentionally expressed as measurable outcomes and documented governance expectations rather than hardwired implementation details.
|
|
- No clarification markers were needed; the user description supplied the required scope, non-goals, and rollout boundaries. |