ahmido
bcabb14480
Automatisch erstellt: Commit aller Änderungen in Branch 260-governance-service-packaging-session-1777640889. Bitte prüfen und mergen. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #315
51 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
51 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Governance-as-a-Service Packaging v1
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and repo fit before planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-05-01
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into the feature contract beyond repo-real route and surface references needed for local convention fit
|
|
- [x] The spec is focused on user value, trust, sellability, and behavior rather than an implementation diff
|
|
- [x] The spec is written so non-technical stakeholders can understand the product outcome and scope boundaries
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections requested by the repo template and constitution are completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic enough to validate product outcome rather than code shape
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions are identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover the primary packaging flows
|
|
- [x] The feature stays on one bounded on-demand package for one released review context
|
|
- [x] The spec explicitly depends on the shared customer-safe interpretation layer and forbids bypassing it
|
|
- [x] The roadmap phrase `open decisions` is narrowed to repo-real exception or risk-acceptance governance decision truth
|
|
- [x] No new panel, package domain, report engine, schedule, or campaign system is introduced
|
|
- [x] Existing review, review-pack, evidence, and stored-report surfaces remain the reuse path
|
|
|
|
## Test Governance
|
|
|
|
- [x] Planned validation stays bounded to focused `confidence` coverage plus one explicit `browser` smoke
|
|
- [x] The spec reuses existing review, tenant-review, review-pack, and evidence test families instead of introducing a new heavy family
|
|
- [x] Reviewer handoff and minimal proof commands are explicit
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Reviewed against `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`, `docs/product/roadmap.md`, `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`, `specs/257-governance-decision-convergence/spec.md`, `specs/258-customer-review-productization/spec.md`, `specs/259-compliance-evidence-mapping/spec.md`, and `.specify/memory/constitution.md` on 2026-05-01.
|
|
- No application implementation was performed while preparing this spec.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- **Outcome class**: `repo-fit-ready`
|
|
- **Outcome**: `keep`
|
|
- **Reason**: The spec stays narrowly on one management-ready package over existing released-review truth, explicitly records the interpretation dependency, narrows the ambiguous `open decisions` phrase to repo-real governance decision truth, and avoids introducing a second package domain.
|
|
- **Workflow result**: Ready for `/speckit.plan` |