ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
bd06b479e1
TenantAtlas/specs/220-governance-run-summaries/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido bd06b479e1
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 43s
Details
feat: add governance run summaries (#257) 
## Summary
- add the Spec 220 governance run diagnostic summary seam and wire it through the canonical operation run detail presenter
- render summary-first decision guidance for covered governance run families while keeping technical diagnostics secondary
- add focused Pest coverage, spec artifacts, and complete the integrated-browser smoke validation for canonical run detail

## Testing
- cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent
- cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Monitoring/GovernanceOperationRunSummariesTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/OperationRunBaselineTruthSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/ArtifactTruthRunDetailTest.php tests/Feature/Authorization/OperatorExplanationSurfaceAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/RunAuthorizationTenantIsolationTest.php tests/Unit/Support/OpsUx/GovernanceRunDiagnosticSummaryBuilderTest.php tests/Unit/Support/OperatorExplanation/OperatorExplanationBuilderTest.php
- integrated browser smoke pass on localhost:8081 covering summary-first hierarchy, zero-output runs, multi-cause runs, cross-family parity, workspace-wide visibility, and deny-as-not-found tenant safety

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #257
2026-04-20 20:46:09 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Humanized Diagnostic Summaries for Governance Operations

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-20
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass 1 complete.
  • Required surface-governance metadata such as routes and action-matrix references are present, but the spec avoids implementation mechanics, framework instructions, and code-level solution design.