ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
bf38ec1780
TenantAtlas/specs/209-heavy-governance-cost/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido a2fdca43fd feat: implement heavy governance cost recovery (#242) 
## Summary
- implement Spec 209 heavy-governance cost recovery end to end
- add the heavy-governance contract, hotspot inventory, decomposition, snapshots, budget outcome, and author-guidance surfaces in the shared lane support seams
- slim the baseline and findings hotspot families, harden wrapper behavior, and refresh the spec, quickstart, and contract artifacts

## Validation
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/TestLaneCommandContractTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/OperationLifecycleOpsUxGuardTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCaptureStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCompareStartSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineActionAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsListFiltersTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingExceptionRenewalTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingWorkflowRowActionsTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingWorkflowViewActionsTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/OperationLifecycleOpsUxGuardTest.php`
- `./scripts/platform-sail artisan test --compact`

## Outcome
- heavy-governance latest artifacts now agree on an authoritative `330s` threshold with `recalibrated` outcome after the honest rerun
- full suite result: `3760 passed`, `8 skipped`, `23535 assertions`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #242
2026-04-17 13:17:13 +00:00

1.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Heavy Governance Lane Cost Reduction

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-17 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation run: 2026-04-17
  • No template placeholders or [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
  • The spec stays repo-governance-focused: it describes lane behavior, hotspot evidence, and budget outcomes without prescribing language-, framework-, or API-level implementation.
  • The spec keeps Heavy Governance honest by requiring explicit budget recovery or explicit recalibration, rather than silent lane reshuffling.
  • Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan