TenantAtlas/specs/278-cross-domain-indicator-audit/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Cross-Domain Progress Indicator Semantics Audit

Purpose: Validate specification completeness, boundedness, implementation evidence, and manual-review readiness
Created: 2026-05-06
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• The package stays repo-based and docs/governance-first instead of widening into runtime contract, component, migration, analytics, or UI rewrite work.
• The spec and plan remain product- and behavior-oriented rather than reading like a low-level code diff.
• The package explicitly names the repo-real standards and source anchors it builds on: docs/ui/tenantpilot-enterprise-ui-standards.md, OperationUxPresenter, InventoryKpiHeader, RecoveryReadiness, BaselineSnapshotPresenter, ReviewPackService, and TenantDashboardSummaryBuilder.
• Mandatory repo sections for scope, RBAC, shared-pattern reuse, testing, proportionality, and candidate rationale are completed.

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
• Requirements are testable and bounded to one docs-only audit bundle: inventory, classification, risk/disposition notes, standards delta, and follow-up map.
• The package explicitly forbids shared indicator component implementation, runtime contract rollout, quality-gate code, domain migration, analytics, charting, score recalculation, and application rewrites.
• Canonical implementation proof commands match across spec.md, plan.md, quickstart.md, and tasks.md, including the implemented audit outputs and bounded documentation destinations.

Repo Truth Anchoring

• The package reflects the candidate and roadmap posture from docs/product/spec-candidates.md and docs/product/roadmap.md.
• The package treats docs/ui/tenantpilot-enterprise-ui-standards.md as the standards-delta target and adds only distilled rules, not the full inventory.
• The package treats the named runtime anchors as source surfaces only and does not assume they will be rewritten in this slice.
• Related Specs 266, 268, 270, 271, and 272 are carried forward as context-only guardrails and not reopened.

Feature Readiness

• The package keeps Filament on Livewire v4, provider registration unchanged in apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php, global search unchanged, and assets unchanged.
• The package introduces no destructive actions, no panel changes, and no runtime authorization or scope changes.
• Later follow-up work is explicitly split into the standards patch lane, metric/indicator contract foundation, shared indicator component system, quality gate lane, and domain migration lane.
• The implementation of this slice is constrained to repository artifacts and documentation targets, not app code.
• inventory.md, follow-up-map.md, and standards-delta.md exist as the package-local implementation outputs.
• docs/product/spec-candidates.md and docs/product/roadmap.md reference the five-lane follow-up posture without promoting runtime work into this slice.

Test Governance

• Proof stays bounded to docs review plus diff and grep validation.
• No new runtime, heavy-governance, or browser lane is introduced.
• Fixture, helper, factory, seed, and context growth stays none because the package does not touch runtime code.
• The review outcome, workflow outcome, and test-governance outcome are carried into plan.md and this checklist.

Notes

• Reviewed against .specify/memory/constitution.md, docs/product/spec-candidates.md, docs/product/roadmap.md, docs/ui/tenantpilot-enterprise-ui-standards.md, and nearby Specs 270, 275, and 277 on 2026-05-06.
• Confirmed the named source anchors exist under apps/platform and are suitable as audit inputs.
• No application implementation was performed while preparing or implementing this package.
• Implementation output review on 2026-05-06 confirmed the inventory, standards delta, follow-up map, UI standards delta, product candidates, and roadmap references remain docs/governance-only.

Review Outcome

• Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
• Workflow outcome: keep
• Test-governance outcome: keep
• Reason: The package prepares one bounded repo audit foundation over real existing cues, keeps runtime follow-up work explicitly separate, and uses honest docs-only proof instead of pretending application behavior changed.
• Implementation result: Ready for manual review.