4.5 KiB
4.5 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: OperationRun Terminal Outcome Feedback v1
Purpose: Validate specification completeness, boundedness, and repo fit before implementation
Created: 2026-05-05
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- The package stays on one bounded terminal-outcome refinement over the existing shell activity hint instead of widening into a new activity center, dashboard card, or notification rewrite.
- The spec remains product- and behavior-oriented and does not read like a low-level implementation diff.
- The package explicitly names the repo-real anchors it builds on:
BulkOperationProgress, the current shell activity view,OperationUxPresenter,OperationRunProgressContract,ActiveRuns, and the existing browser-session event flow. - Mandatory repo sections for scope, RBAC, Ops-UX, testing, proportionality, and candidate rationale are completed.
Requirement Completeness
- No
[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]markers remain. - Requirements are testable and stay bounded to current shell terminal-success and terminal-follow-up semantics only.
- The package explicitly preserves canonical
View operationandShow all operationslink generation instead of reopening routing decisions. - The package makes the lifecycle-sensitive tertiary contract explicit:
Hide activitywhile active,DismissorClosefor terminal success, andAcknowledgefor unresolved terminal follow-up. - The package keeps acknowledgement browser-session-only and forbids DB-backed review state.
- Planned validation commands match across
spec.md,plan.md, andtasks.md.
Candidate Selection Gate
- The selected candidate exists in
docs/product/spec-candidates.mdand aligns with the roadmap's manual-promotion backlog. - The active queue remains intentionally empty, so this package records itself as a deliberate manual promotion rather than an automatic next-best-prep target.
- No existing
269-*spec package exists, and the current repo truth still leaves an open semantic gap even though Spec 268 and current code already introduced the broader shell activity surface. - The chosen slice is smaller and more repo-ready than deferred alternatives because it tightens one live shell contract before dashboard or broader progress follow-ups.
Feature Readiness
- The package reuses existing
OperationRuntruth and current shell helpers instead of introducing a second lifecycle or persisted projection. - The package explicitly leaves dashboard, tray, notification-policy, and progress-rollout work out of scope.
- The package preserves current tenant-bound visibility and current Operations drill-through ownership.
- The standards document update is included in the same slice so the terminal outcome rule becomes durable repo guidance.
Test Governance
- Planned proof stays bounded to focused Feature coverage plus one named browser smoke for the shell interaction contract.
- No new heavy-governance, discovery, or browser family is introduced by default.
- Fixture growth stays bounded to current
OperationRunfactories, tenant helpers, and existing shell smoke helpers. - The review outcome, workflow outcome, and test-governance outcome are carried into
plan.mdandtasks.md.
Notes
- Reviewed against
docs/product/spec-candidates.md,docs/product/roadmap.md,.specify/memory/constitution.md,apps/platform/app/Livewire/BulkOperationProgress.php,apps/platform/resources/views/livewire/bulk-operation-progress.blade.php,apps/platform/tests/Feature/OpsUx/ActivityFeedbackSurfaceTest.php,apps/platform/tests/Feature/OpsUx/BulkOperationProgressDbOnlyTest.php, andapps/platform/tests/Browser/OpsUx/OperationActivityFeedbackSmokeTest.phpon 2026-05-05. - Related-spec guardrail: Spec 268 remains the current shell-activity foundation and must not be rewritten back into prep-only state. This package only narrows the still-open terminal-outcome semantics seam.
- No application implementation was performed while preparing this package.
Review Outcome
- Outcome class:
acceptable-special-case - Workflow outcome:
keep - Test-governance outcome:
keep - Reason: The automatic queue is intentionally empty, but this manual promotion is still justified because current repo truth shows an open terminal-outcome semantics gap on a live shell surface that is smaller and safer than the deferred dashboard or broader progress follow-ups.
- Workflow result: Ready for implementation.