ahmido
1fec9c6f9d
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 45s
## Summary - introduce surface-aware compressed governance outcomes and reuse the shared truth/explanation seams for operator-first summaries - apply the compressed outcome hierarchy across baseline, evidence, review, review-pack, canonical review/evidence, and artifact-oriented operation-run surfaces - expand spec 214 fixtures and Pest coverage, and fix tenant-panel route assertions by generating explicit tenant-panel URLs in the affected Filament tests ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - focused governance compression suite from `specs/214-governance-outcome-compression/quickstart.md` passed (`68` tests, `445` assertions) - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/InventoryItemResourceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BackupSetUiEnforcementTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/RestoreRunUiEnforcementTest.php` passed (`18` tests, `81` assertions) Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #253
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Governance Operator Outcome Compression
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-19
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- No
[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]markers remain in the spec. - The spec stays bounded to adoption of existing governance truth and explanation foundations across listed artifact surfaces.
- Repo-required surface matrices identify existing affected surfaces without introducing new implementation decisions or dependency changes.