TenantAtlas/specs/209-heavy-governance-cost/checklists/requirements.md
2026-04-17 15:15:23 +02:00

38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown

# Specification Quality Checklist: Heavy Governance Lane Cost Reduction
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-04-17
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
## Content Quality
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
## Notes
- Validation run: 2026-04-17
- No template placeholders or [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
- The spec stays repo-governance-focused: it describes lane behavior, hotspot evidence, and budget outcomes without prescribing language-, framework-, or API-level implementation.
- The spec keeps Heavy Governance honest by requiring explicit budget recovery or explicit recalibration, rather than silent lane reshuffling.
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`