5.5 KiB
5.5 KiB
Requirements Checklist: Spec 403 - Evidence Anchor & Currentness Runtime Closure
Purpose: Validate preparation quality for Spec 403 before implementation starts.
Created: 2026-06-23
Feature: specs/403-evidence-anchor-currentness-runtime-closure/spec.md
Candidate Selection
- The selected candidate was directly provided by the operator.
- The candidate is linked to Spec 400 evidence/currentness risk and Spec 402's recommended next action.
docs/product/spec-candidates.mdwas reviewed and currently reports no safe automatic next-best-prep target.- Close alternatives are deferred instead of hidden inside the primary scope.
- The target does not reopen completed Specs 388, 393, 400, 401, or 402.
- No existing
specs/403-evidence-anchor-currentness-runtime-closure/package existed before preparation. - Spec 402 prerequisite is recorded as
PASSwith no P0/P1 authorization blocker.
Scope Quality
- The spec is bounded to existing evidence/currentness proof and minimal hardening.
- No new product vocabulary, surfaces, navigation, routes, migrations, report/PDF runtime, provider integration, or broad audit is included.
- Evidence Overview and EvidenceSnapshotResource are explicitly in scope.
- Customer Review Workspace, review packs, environment reviews, and stored reports are explicitly in scope.
- OperationRun proof links and authorization/scoping are explicitly in scope.
- Baseline, restore, finding/governance, and report evidence references are explicitly in scope where existing surfaces are repo-real.
- Customer-safe boundary, current/released distinction, and workspace/environment isolation are explicit.
- Provider freshness and permission-limited evidence-currentness contracts are covered where repo-real.
- Management PDF staging validation, governance lifecycle/retention, JSONB migration, and full browser audit are deferred.
Constitution And Product Surface
- Spec Candidate Check is filled out.
- Approval class is exactly one class: Core Enterprise.
- Score is recorded and above the minimum threshold.
- Proportionality Review is completed and forbids new runtime framework/state/persistence by default.
- No runtime source of truth, persisted table, enum/status family, taxonomy, or broad proof framework is introduced.
- Product Surface Contract is referenced because rendered evidence/status/report/customer-safe behavior may change.
- UI Surface Impact is classified as existing-surface evidence/currentness hardening only.
- UI coverage registry review/update is required for touched existing surfaces when runtime UI files or reachable evidence/status semantics change.
- Browser proof is required for representative rendered evidence/currentness behavior.
- Human Product Sanity is required for customer-safe/readiness/evidence surfaces.
- Completed-spec rewrite guardrail is explicit.
Plan Quality
- Plan identifies Laravel, Filament, Livewire, Pest, Sail, and PostgreSQL context.
- Plan names panel provider registration location.
- Plan names likely affected repository surfaces.
- Plan requires matrix-first work before runtime fixes.
- Plan distinguishes evidence truth, released/report truth, OperationRun proof truth, restore/baseline/finding proof references, customer-safe boundary, and authorization.
- Plan requires existing evidence/proof helpers to remain authoritative unless matrix/tests prove a gap.
- Plan requires route-inventory and design-coverage-matrix review/update when runtime UI files or reachable evidence/status semantics change.
- Plan forbids new framework/status/persistence/product vocabulary by default.
- Plan includes rollout/deployment impact and expects no migrations/env/assets/queues/storage changes.
Task Quality
- Tasks are ordered by preparation, inventory, matrix, gap classification, tests, hardening, product sanity, browser proof, and report close-out.
- Tasks require tests before runtime fixes where feasible.
- Tasks include current evidence, stale/missing/failed/partial, released/current, customer-safe, OperationRun, cross-workspace, and cross-environment proof.
- Tasks include restore, baseline, finding/governance, report, and review proof tasks where applicable.
- Tasks include provider freshness / permission-limited state inventory, matrix classification, and tests where repo-real.
- Tasks include Filament v5 output contract close-out fields for Livewire, provider registration, global search, destructive/high-impact actions, assets, tests/browser, and deployment.
- Tasks include focused browser proof and explicitly forbid claiming full browser audit.
- Tasks include dirty-state protocol before and after implementation.
- Tasks include final implementation report sections A through M.
- Tasks include non-goals that prevent scope creep.
Open Questions And Readiness
- No open question blocks implementation preparation.
- Missing product decisions are required to be reported rather than invented.
- Spec Readiness Gate can pass after artifact analysis.
- Candidate Selection Gate passes as a manual operator-promoted candidate.
Review Outcome
- Review outcome class:
acceptable-special-casefor a bounded evidence/currentness runtime closure spec. - Workflow outcome:
keep. - Final note location: future implementation report
specs/403-evidence-anchor-currentness-runtime-closure/implementation-report.md.