TenantAtlas/specs/338-workspace-environment-resource-scope-contract/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 338 - Workspace / Environment Resource Scope Contract

Purpose: Validate specification completeness, preparation quality, and readiness before implementation. Created: 2026-05-30 Feature: specs/338-workspace-environment-resource-scope-contract/spec.md

Candidate Selection Gate

• Spec 338 was directly provided/promoted by the user as the preparation target.
• Completed-spec guardrail checked that no existing specs/338-* package existed before creation.
• Branch guardrail checked that no existing 338-* branch existed locally before creation.
• docs/product/spec-candidates.md was inspected; it states the active auto-prep queue is empty, so this spec proceeds only because the user directly supplied/promoted it.
• Related completed/historical specs were treated as context only and remain unchanged:
  • specs/311-workspace-environment-surface-scope-contract/ (implemented + validated)
  • specs/320-workspace-owned-analysis-surface-registration-shell-cutover/ (completed)
  • specs/322-browser-no-drift-regression-guard/ (guard posture)

Close Alternatives Deferred

• Provider Connection Scope Hardening (already a promoted candidate) is deferred; this spec focuses on link/query and evidence scope seams.
• Canonical Link / Query Cleanup remains related and partially overlaps; Spec 338 scope is kept tight around confirmed helper outputs and evidence special casing.
• Environment Resource Context Follow-through remains separate (resource internals); this spec focuses on contract seams and helper outputs.

Content Quality

• Problem statement is operator-visible and framed as “scope drift + non-canonical deep links”, not internal refactor desire.
• Scope is bounded to confirmed seams: OperationRunLinks query output contract and evidence special casing; baseline navigation is regression-only.
• Explicit non-goals prevent reopening Spec 311/320 scope work or starting a navigation redesign.
• Mandatory Spec Candidate Check is complete (score + decision included).
• No unresolved placeholder markers remain.

Requirement Completeness

• Scope taxonomy and link/query contract are documented inside spec.md.
• Required runtime decisions are explicit for:
  • Operation type deep links (no tableFilters in helper output)
  • Evidence /admin/evidence/* special casing (remove if stale, otherwise document + test)
  • baseline ownership/navigation (regression-only)
• Acceptance criteria are concrete and testable.

Plan Quality

• Plan records stack context (Laravel/Filament/Livewire/Pest/PostgreSQL) and the no-migration/no-route-rewrite constraint.
• Plan includes a “failing tests first” phase for contract changes.
• OperationRun UX Impact is limited to link semantics; no lifecycle changes are planned.

Task Quality

• Tasks are ordered from repo-truth → failing tests → implementation → validation.
• Task IDs follow the required checkbox format and are verifiable.
• Tasks include explicit non-goals to prevent scope creep.

Constitution / Repo Alignment

• No new persisted entity, table, or artifact is introduced by this spec.
• No new taxonomy framework is proposed; the spec reuses existing navigation/scope seams (AdminSurfaceScope, hub registry, navigation context).
• Provider boundary is respected: platform-core scope keys (environment_id) remain separate from provider “tenant” identity semantics.
• Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is assumed by project baseline; this spec does not introduce version drift.

Preparation Analysis Outcome

• Preparation artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md) are internally consistent after manual /speckit.analyze-style review.
• Every acceptance criterion maps to one or more tasks.
• No preparation issue requires application implementation to resolve.
• Candidate Selection Gate result: PASS.
• Spec Readiness Gate result: PASS for later implementation.

Notes

• Repository has prompt/agent definitions for speckit.tasks and speckit.analyze, but no local executable Bash command for those phases. Tasks and analysis were therefore produced repo-conformantly from templates and checked manually in this checklist.