ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
d2f2c55ead
TenantAtlas/specs/140-onboarding-lifecycle-operation-checkpoints-concurrency-mvp/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido d2f2c55ead feat: add onboarding lifecycle checkpoints and locking (#169) 
## Summary
- add canonical onboarding lifecycle and checkpoint fields plus optimistic locking versioning for managed tenant onboarding drafts
- introduce centralized onboarding lifecycle and mutation services and route wizard mutations through version-checked writes
- convert Verify Access and Bootstrap into live checkpoint-driven wizard states with conditional polling and updated browser/feature/unit coverage
- add Spec Kit artifacts for feature 140, including spec, plan, tasks, research, data model, quickstart, checklist, and logical contract

## Validation
- branch was committed and pushed cleanly
- focused tests and formatting were updated during implementation work
- full validation was not re-run as part of this final git/PR step

## Notes
- base branch: `dev`
- feature branch: `140-onboarding-lifecycle-operation-checkpoints-concurrency-mvp`
- outstanding follow-up items, if any, remain tracked in `specs/140-onboarding-lifecycle-operation-checkpoints-concurrency-mvp/tasks.md`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #169
2026-03-14 11:02:29 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Onboarding Lifecycle, Operation Checkpoints & Concurrency MVP

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-14
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Architectural constraints are intentionally described at the workflow level because this repository's constitution requires explicit lifecycle, operation, authorization, and Filament-surface alignment in feature specs.