TenantAtlas/specs/255-enforce-finding-creation-invariants/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Enforce Creation-Time Finding Invariants

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-29
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• Repo-specific classes, routes, file paths, and validation commands appear only where they are required to keep the three active writer families and proof obligations unambiguous
• Focused on user value and business needs
• Written for product and review stakeholders, with repo-grounded detail only where the bounded invariant target would otherwise stay ambiguous
• All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Success criteria are measurable
• Success criteria stay outcome-oriented even though the package names concrete writer families and proof files needed to bound the slice
• All acceptance scenarios are defined
• Edge cases are identified
• Scope is clearly bounded
• Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• User scenarios cover primary flows
• Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
• No unbounded implementation plan leaks into the specification; repo-specific commands and paths stay limited to selection, dependency, and validation context

Test Governance Review

• Lane fit is explicit: the package uses fast-feedback and confidence, with the three writer suites as the primary proof and only bounded recurrence, consumer, and trigger-authorization regressions where FR-255-005, FR-255-006, FR-255-009, and FR-255-011 require them.
• No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; adjacent proof remains inside existing feature suites only.
• Suite-cost outcome stays bounded and reviewable: the package reuses existing writer, recurrence, consumer, and auth suites without adding a new default-heavy harness.

Review Outcome

• Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
• Workflow outcome: keep
• Review-note location is explicit: guardrail, lane-fit, and bounded-proof notes live in spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and this checklist.

Notes

• Repo-surface names, validation commands, and current writer/test anchors are intentionally present because this prep package must distinguish the three active finding writers from already-completed adjacent cleanup specs.
• The spec remains behavior-first: write-time lifecycle readiness, recurrence identity, reopen truth, and unchanged RBAC/tenant isolation are the product outcomes; repo details only keep the package reviewable and bounded.
• No blocking open question remains for safe planning.