ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
d90fb0f963
TenantAtlas/specs/053-unify-runs-monitoring/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 30ad57baab feat/053-unify-runs-monitoring (#60) 
Summary

This PR introduces Unified Operations Runs + Monitoring Hub (053).

Goal: Standardize how long-running operations are tracked and monitored using the existing tenant-scoped run record (BulkOperationRun) as the canonical “operation run”, and surface it in a single Monitoring → Operations hub (view-only, tenant-scoped, role-aware).

Phase 1 adoption scope (per spec):
	•	Drift generation (drift.generate)
	•	Backup Set “Add Policies” (backup_set.add_policies)

Note: This PR does not convert every run type yet (e.g. GroupSyncRuns / InventorySyncRuns remain separate for now). This is intentionally incremental.

⸻

What changed

Monitoring / Operations hub
	•	Moved/organized run monitoring under Monitoring → Operations
	•	Added:
	•	status buckets (queued / running / succeeded / partially succeeded / failed)
	•	filters (run type, status bucket, time range)
	•	run detail “Related” links (e.g. Drift findings, Backup Set context)
	•	All hub pages are DB-only and view-only (no rerun/cancel/delete actions)

Canonical run semantics
	•	Added canonical helpers on BulkOperationRun:
	•	runType() (resource.action)
	•	statusBucket() derived from status + counts (testable semantics)

Drift integration (Phase 1)
	•	Drift generation start behavior now:
	•	creates/reuses a BulkOperationRun with drift context payload (scope_key + baseline/current run ids)
	•	dispatches generation job
	•	emits DB notifications including “View run” link
	•	On generation failure: stores sanitized failure entries + sends failure notification

Permissions / tenant isolation
	•	Monitoring run list/view is tenant-scoped and returns 403 for cross-tenant access
	•	Readonly can view runs but cannot start drift generation

⸻

Tests

Added/updated Pest coverage:
	•	BulkOperationRunStatusBucketTest.php
	•	DriftGenerationDispatchTest.php
	•	GenerateDriftFindingsJobNotificationTest.php
	•	RunAuthorizationTenantIsolationTest.php

Validation run locally:
	•	./vendor/bin/pint --dirty
	•	targeted tests from feature quickstart / drift monitoring tests

⸻

Manual QA
	1.	Go to Monitoring → Operations
	•	verify filters (run type / status / time range)
	•	verify run detail shows counts + sanitized failures + “Related” links
	2.	Open Drift Landing
	•	with >=2 successful inventory runs for scope: should queue drift generation + show notification with “View run”
	•	as readonly: should not start generation
	3.	Run detail
	•	drift.generate runs show “Drift findings” related link
	•	failure entries are sanitized (no secrets/tokens/raw payload dumps)

⸻

Notes / Ops
	•	Queue workers must be restarted after deploy so they load the new code:
	•	php artisan queue:restart (or Sail equivalent)
	•	This PR standardizes monitoring for Phase 1 producers only; follow-ups will migrate additional run types into the unified pattern.

⸻

Spec / Docs
	•	SpecKit artifacts added under specs/053-unify-runs-monitoring/
	•	Checklists are complete:
	•	requirements checklist PASS
	•	writing checklist PASS

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@adsmac.local>
Reviewed-on: #60
2026-01-16 15:10:31 +00:00

1.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Unified Operations Runs + Monitoring Hub (053)

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-01-15
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan
  • Validation run on 2026-01-15; no issues found.