ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
e1a7752f40
TenantAtlas/specs/401-high-risk-admin-action-proof-pack/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido e1a7752f40 chore: finalize high risk admin action proof pack (#472) 
Automated PR created by Codex automation.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #472
2026-06-23 00:24:08 +00:00

4.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 401 - High-risk Admin Action Proof Pack

Purpose: Validate preparation completeness and quality before implementation. Created: 2026-06-22 Feature: specs/401-high-risk-admin-action-proof-pack/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No unresolved template placeholders remain.
  • Mandatory Spec Kit sections are completed or explicitly marked with rationale.
  • The spec focuses on product/operator value and high-risk action safety.
  • Implementation details are used only where repo truth, proof paths, or safety constraints require them.
  • Existing TenantPilot terminology is preserved.

Candidate Selection Gate

  • Candidate source is direct user-provided Spec 401 draft.
  • docs/product/spec-candidates.md auto-queue status was checked and does not override the direct user-provided candidate.
  • Related existing specs were checked for duplication/completed-spec risk.
  • No existing specs/401-high-risk-admin-action-proof-pack/ package existed before preparation.
  • Close alternatives are deferred with reasons.
  • Smallest viable implementation slice is bounded to proof map, focused tests/browser proof, and minimal hardening.

Requirement Completeness

  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
  • Restore, backup, and provider target domains are all covered.
  • Authorization, workspace/environment isolation, direct invocation, confirmation, cancellation, audit/evidence, OperationRun, and browser proof are covered.
  • Functional requirements include negative proof for cancelled/forbidden actions.
  • Product Surface Contract, Filament/Livewire, global search, destructive action, asset, and deployment posture are covered.
  • Out-of-scope boundaries prevent feature expansion.
  • Assumptions and stop conditions are documented.
  • No blocking open questions remain.

Plan Quality

  • Plan identifies likely repo surfaces without inventing new architecture.
  • Plan distinguishes execution truth, artifact truth, backup/snapshot truth, recovery/evidence truth, and operator next action.
  • Plan states no migrations, env vars, assets, panel provider changes, queues, scheduler, or storage changes expected by default.
  • Plan includes Product Surface, UI guardrail, Filament/Livewire, OperationRun UX, provider-boundary, RBAC, security, audit, and test governance handling.
  • Plan includes stop conditions for scope expansion.

Task Quality

  • Tasks are ordered by safety/inventory, foundational tests, restore proof, backup proof, provider proof, browser proof, and close-out.
  • Tasks use checkbox format with stable IDs and file paths.
  • Tests are planned before implementation where feasible.
  • Browser proof and Human Product Sanity are explicit.
  • Tasks include final validation and implementation-report requirements.
  • Tasks explicitly forbid completed-spec rewrites and broad scope expansion.

Product Surface Contract

  • Spec references docs/product/standards/product-surface-contract.md.
  • No-legacy posture is explicit.
  • Product Surface Impact records archetypes, primary question/action, surface-budget expectation, technical demotion, canonical status vocabulary, visible complexity, and exceptions.
  • Browser proof is required for rendered UI/action changes.
  • Human Product Sanity is required.
  • Implementation-report fields are specified.
  • Completed historical specs are protected from rewrite/normalization.

Constitution Alignment

  • No new persisted truth is planned.
  • No new enum/status/reason family is planned.
  • No new runtime abstraction/framework is planned.
  • No new provider family or provider-core generalization is planned.
  • RBAC, workspace isolation, tenant isolation, auditability, and OperationRun semantics are addressed.
  • Test governance and lane scope are explicit.
  • Spec Candidate Check is completed with approval class, score, red flags, and decision.

Review Outcome

  • Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case for a bounded high-risk proof pack.
  • Workflow outcome: keep.
  • Final note location: implementation report / final implementation response.

Notes

This checklist validates preparation only. It does not claim runtime implementation, test execution, browser proof, Human Product Sanity completion, or implementation close-out.