ahmido
4db73e872e
## Summary - add conditional polling support for the tenantless operation run viewer and tenant review pack card - add focused Pest coverage for active vs terminal polling behavior and related review pack access regressions - add the full Spec Kit artifacts for Spec 123, including spec, plan, research, data model, contracts, quickstart, tasks, and checklist ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/OpsUx/RunDetailPollingStopsOnTerminalTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/TenantlessOperationRunViewerTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackGenerationTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackRbacTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Notes - Manual QA task `T014` in the Spec Kit checklist remains to be completed outside this automated flow. - Livewire v4.0+ compliance is unchanged. - No panel provider changes were made; provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php`. - No global-search behavior was changed. - No destructive actions were added or modified. - No new Filament assets were introduced; existing deployment expectations for `php artisan filament:assets` remain unchanged. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #149
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Operations Auto-Refresh Pass
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-08
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated after the initial draft. The spec stays focused on user-facing monitoring behavior, bounded scope, and measurable refresh outcomes.
|
|
- Constitution-alignment sections describe unchanged operational and authorization guardrails without expanding feature scope.
|