ahmido
ea9ef9cb38
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 48s
## Summary - add Spec 212 planning artifacts for test authoring constitution and review guardrails - expand `TEST-GOV-001` and sync the SpecKit spec/plan/tasks/checklist templates plus contributor guidance - define the canonical review checklist outcomes and record low-impact and higher-cost validation examples ## Validation - docs/workflow only; no runtime Pest or Sail test lanes were run - validation is recorded in `specs/212-test-authoring-guardrails/spec.md` and `specs/212-test-authoring-guardrails/quickstart.md` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #245
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Test Suite Authoring Constitution & Review Guardrails
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-18
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation completed in one iteration.
- No unresolved clarification markers or template placeholders remain.
- The spec stays repository-process focused and aligns with the existing test-governance chain from Specs 206 through 211.