ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
ebf88cd05b
TenantAtlas/specs/160-operation-lifecycle-guarantees/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 845d21db6d feat: harden operation lifecycle monitoring (#190) 
## Summary
- harden operation-run lifecycle handling with explicit reconciliation policy, stale-run healing, failed-job bridging, and monitoring visibility
- refactor audit log event inspection into a Filament slide-over and remove the stale inline detail/header-action coupling
- align panel theme asset resolution and supporting Filament UI updates, including the rounded 2xl theme token regression fix

## Testing
- ran focused Pest coverage for the affected audit-log inspection flow and related visibility tests
- ran formatting with `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- manually verified the updated audit-log slide-over flow in the integrated browser

## Notes
- branch includes the Spec 160 artifacts under `specs/160-operation-lifecycle-guarantees/`
- the full test suite was not rerun as part of this final commit/PR step

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #190
2026-03-23 21:53:19 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Operation Lifecycle Guarantees & Queue-to-Domain Failure Reconciliation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-23
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed on 2026-03-23.
  • No open clarification markers remain.
  • The spec intentionally names domain objects already established in the product, but avoids prescribing implementation structure.